Open Access

Stress associated with hospitalization in patients with COPD: the role of social support and health related quality of life

  • Magdalena Medinas-Amorós1Email author,
  • Juan José Montaño-Moreno2,
  • Maria José Centeno-Flores3,
  • Victoria Ferrer-Pérez2,
  • Feliu Renom-Sotorra4,
  • Belen Martín-López2 and
  • Catalina Alorda-Quetglas2
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine20127:51

DOI: 10.1186/2049-6958-7-51

Received: 6 June 2012

Accepted: 19 September 2012

Published: 10 December 2012

Abstract

Background

The objective of this study was to determine stress levels during hospitalization in patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD). We wanted to relate stress to previous level of quality of life and patients’ Social Support.

Methods

80 patients (70.43; SD = 8.13 years old) with COPD were assessed by means of: Hospital Stress Rating Scale, Nottingham Health Profile, St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire and Social Support Scale.

Results

COPD patients’ stress levels are lower than expected independently from the severity or number of previous hospitalizations. Linear regression analysis shows the predictive value of Quality of Life and Social Support on stress level during hospitalization (p < 0.0001).

Conclusion

HRQOL and social support can be associated with stress during hospitalization.

Keywords

Hospitalization Quality of Life Social Support Stress

Background

The physical and social configuration of hospitals implies the possibility of introducing inpatients to adverse psychological effects. These effects have been described and analyzed by different authors over the past few years[14]. Volicer et al[5]. identified hospital experiences related to routine attention that are perceived as stressful during hospitalization, like: difficulties to obtain data concerning their own therapeutic processes, ignorance of the consequences of the disease, dangers that test involves, reduction of intimate space in the room, use of medical language, restriction of visits of own family’s members and friends, etc. Based on these observations the authors drew up the 40 items questionnaire called Hospital Stress Rating Scale. This scale was validated and translated in Spanish by Kendall[6]. Between 1977 and 1978 other studies on stress during hospitalization incorporated the importance of cardiovascular and socio-demographic factors during hospitalization[79], coping strategies and psychological impact[10, 11] and severity of the disease, and presence of pain as important variables, affirming that some of them can predict stress level during hospitalization[12] in acute patients. During the 80s, authors focused their interest on factors related to the patients’ difficulties of adjustment to hospital[1315]. Researches carried out over the two last decades have extended the study of the iatrogenic effects of hospitalization to different pathologies[16, 17] or stress perception differences between patients and health care staff[11, 18, 19].

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) is one of the most prevalent respiratory diseases with a frequent need for hospitalization[20]; these patients suffer acute exacerbations during the year and hospitalization is an important part of patient care. The illness severity and a progressive loss of quality of life and physical mobility deteriorate patients’social and family support[21]. Nevertheless, although poor relations between pulmonary function and quality of life and social support have been reported in the literature[22], recent studies have shown that improving physical activity (specific rehabilitation programs) can reduce symptoms and associated psychological dysfunctions and increase well-being and quality of life in these patients[23, 24].

Currently, a bibliographic review of databases does not show scientific studies concerning stress or the psychological effects of hospitalization in patients with COPD or in patients with chronic diseases who need frequent hospitalization. Andenaes et al[25] observed high levels of stress in hospitalized COPD patients, concluding that 58.7% of them showed different levels of stress in comparison to non-hospitalized COPD patients. Then, in their follow up study, Andenaes et al[26] observed a decrease in stress levels nine months after hospitalization; so the authors deduced that this had clearly been caused by hospitalization.

In a previous study, we can observe that patients with COPD suffer low stress levels during hospitalization[27] but it is not clear the role of Health Related Quality of Life (HRQOL) and Social Support. For this reason, the aim of this study is to determine stress levels during hospitalization in patients with a chronic disease such as COPD. After that, we want to relate these parameters to the previous level of quality of life and patients’ social support. We have hypothesized that these last two parameters can contribute to diminishing stress levels in COPD patients.

Methods

Study design and patients

A cross-sectional sample of patients with COPD was selected and examined comprehensively with lung-function tests and a battery of specific scales described in the measures section. All patients were inpatients and were assessed after 10 days of hospitalization. This study was approved by the Ethical Committee at the Department of Research of GESMA, Balearic Islands, Spain. All patients signed the Informed Consent before the study. Finally, 80 consecutive patients (65 men and 15 women) with a diagnosis of COPD who agreed to participate and who met the Inclusion Criteria were included in our study. Inclusion criteria were as follows: COPD with a ratio of FEV1/forced vital capacity (FVC) < 0.7, FEV1 < 80% of predicted, age 45–90 years. Exclusion Criteria were : another disabling or severe disease that could prevent carrying out all study tests, and/or dementia. Patients with an indicative history of asthma were excluded. No patient had an acute COPD exacerbation at the time of the research.

Clinical data and lung-function tests

All participants were administered a structured clinical interview to obtain the following clinical, social and demographic parameters: age, gender, occupation, education level, degree of severity of COPD based on spirometry, degree of dyspnoea[28] (MRC, Medical Research Scale), number of hospitalizations during the previous year and comorbidities by Charlson Index[29]. Assessment of lung function (FEV1, FVC, absolute and reference values) was based on the 2006 reference spirometry values from Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease (GOLD Classification).

Questionnaires and scales

Hospital Stress Rating Scale[5](HSRS): made up of a list of 49 commonly stressful hospital events assessed by patients (9 points: 1 “not at all stressful”, 9 “extremely stressful”) as to whether he or she had experienced it. We applied the author’s score correction (items summation); range of scores was 49 to 441 points.

The Nottingham Health Profile[30](NHP): The NHP was developed for General Quality of Life measurement. It consists of two parts. Part I contains 38 yes/no items in six dimensions: pain, physical mobility, emotional reactions, energy, social isolation, and sleep. Part II contains seven general yes/no questions on daily living problems. The two parts may be used independently, and part II has not been analyzed in this study. The NHP questionnaire has an adapted, validated Spanish version[31], which was used in our study. A higher NHP score shows a worse quality of life.

The St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ)[32]: is a standardized self-administered airways disease-specific questionnaire. This questionnaire has an adapted and validated Spanish version used in our study[33]. It contains 50 items divided into three subscales: symptoms (8 items), including several respiratory symptoms, their frequency and severity; activity (16 items), on activities that cause or are limited by breathlessness; and impact (26 items) which covers a wide range of aspects related with social functioning and psychological disturbances resulting from airways disease. The higher is the SGRQ score the lower the general quality of life.

The Medical Research Council Scale (MRC)[28]: comprises 5 self-administered statements that describe respiratory disability (Dyspnoea) from none (Grade 1) to almost complete incapacity (Grade 4).

MOS Social Support Survey[34](MOS). A total of 19 functional support items were developed to assess perceptions of the availability of different functional aspects of support. Subscales of MOS are: Emotional support (4 items), Informational support (4 items), Tangible support (4 items), Affectionate support (3 items) and Positive social interaction (4 items). Higher scores correspond to more social support. The MOS Social Support Survey, Spanish version, was identical to the original version.

Procedure

Sample selection and later information collection were carried out in the Pneumology Unit of the Joan March Hospital in Majorca, Spain. The final sample was made up of patients diagnosed with COPD, selected consecutively according to when they were admitted to the afore-mentioned hospital. Patients were assessed during the next 10 days, once their clinical state had been stabilized. All patients were assessed by means of two interviews. During the first interview, socio-demographic, clinical data and Informed Consent were registered. In a second interview, the above scales and questionnaires were administered. All assessment was carried out in the patient’s room without a companion to guarantee confidentiality and correct administration of the questionnaires.

Statistical analysis

Data were analyzed by means of statistical program SPSS 17. For the socio-demographic and clinical data and MRC a descriptive study was conducted. For total stress scores, quality of life and social support variables, the variable’s distribution was analyzed before multiple comparison tests in order to verify our hypothesis. For Multiple Regression analysis (stepwise method), only normal distribution variables were selected. The significance level used was p < 0.05 (Confidence Interval: 95 %).

Results

A sample of 80 patients with a mean age of 70.43 years (SD = 8.13), range 49–87 years, were included. Socio-demographic characteristics reveal that patients are mainly married/partner men (52.1%), retired (47.9%), with a medium level of studies (65.15%), who live with their families (69.68%). Clinical data are showed in Table 1.
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of the sample (n = 80)

Variable

Mean

SD

FVC

63.58

19.65

FEV1 % ref.

36.89

16.20

Basal SaO2

92.40

2.87

MRC

3.01

0.76

Number of previous hospitalizations/year.

3.29

1.31

The HSRS results show a lower value than the mean score of the HSRS questionnaire (range of scores: 49 to 441 points)[5]; HSRS mean score: 220.5; COPD patients mean score: 166, 4; difference: 54.1 points. COPD patients consider the items related to change of habits, loss of control, loss of autonomy and privacy, as the most stressful items during hospitalization.

The comparative analysis of clinical severity variables, based on Gold classification, number of previous hospitalizations and MRC scale don’t show significant differences in stress level (Figure 1).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2F2049-6958-7-51/MediaObjects/40248_2012_Article_54_Fig1_HTML.jpg
Figure 1

Stress level results (HSRS) based on severity and number of previous hospitalizations/year (PH). FEV1% pred.: Forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1) % predicted; PH: Number of previous hospitalizations/year.

A descriptive study of the HRQOL and MOS questionnaires shows that these were bad in all COPD patients (Table 2). Table 3 shows the significant (p < 0.05) results based on NHP, MOS and SGRQ comparisons. The division into “High” and “Low” scores has been based on the statistical study of the obtained scores, placing the point of court in the percentile 50. The percentile 50 has been calculated for every questionnaire.
Table 2

Results of HSRS, HRQOL (SGRQ and NHP) and MOS questionnaires for COPD patients (n = 80)

Instrument

Subscale

Min.

Max.

Mean

S.Err.

HSRS

Total score

49

441

166.4

36.89

SGRQ

Symptoms

19.68

85.70

57.329

17.180

 

Activity

22.30

100.00

66.973

21.514

 

Impact

16.96

89.20

46.542

18.844

 

Total score

25.53

86.89

55.685

15.689

MOS

Emotional support

14.00

40.00

29.411

8.658

 

Tangible support

7.00

24.00

16.843

4.328

 

Positive social interaction

4.00

20.00

13.764

4.572

 

Affectionate

3.00

15.00

10.921

4.117

 

Total Score

35.00

95.00

70.941

19.153

NHP

Energy

0.00

100.00

63.010

33.746

 

Pain

0.00

100.00

23.589

34.361

 

Physical mobility

10.80

88.80

59.057

22.911

 

Emotional reactions

0.00

100.00

30.644

28.922

 

Sleep

0.00

100.00

44.464

33.588

 

Social isolation

0.00

87.00

22.285

23.869

 

Total Score

6.00

81.68

40.161

18.402

Table 3

Stress level (HSRS) based on NHP SGRQ and MOS subscales (only p < 0.05 results)

Variable

Mean HSRS

Stand. Error

Levene test (p)

Student test (p)

Total Score NHP

High HRQOL

161.064

8.996

F = 0.087 (p = 0.769)

t = −2.003 p = 0.050

Low HRQOL

179.400

12.107

  

Physical Movility (PM)

Without PM

145.600

6.888

F = 8.692 (p = 0.005)

t = −3.381 p = 0.002

With PM

190.038

11.192

  

Pain

No pain

149.931

6.697

F = 7.597 (p = 0.010)

(t = 2.694) p = 0.009

With pain

192.409

12.831

  

SGRQ Total Score

High HRQOL

150.000

8.273

F = 2.672 (P = 0.202)

t: -2.597 p = 0.012

Low HRQOL

185.807

10.930

  

Impact

Low impact

151.160

8.254

F = 2.915 (P = 0.094)

t = −2.412 p = 0.020

High impact

184.692

11.083

  

MOS Total Score

Without Social Support

192.200

16.482

F = 4.078 (P = 0.049)

t: 2.204 p = 0.032

With Social Support

158.277

7.228

  

Positive Social Interaction (PSI)

No PSI

200.300

18.294

F = 1.201 (P = 0.279)

t: 2.262 p = 0.028

With PSI

160.439

7.496

  
Linear Regression: normal distribution variables were selected: clinical variables (FEV1% ref., and previous hospitalizations), NHP variables (Pain, Physical Mobility and Total Score), SGRQ variables (Impact and Total Score), MOS (total score and Positive social interaction) and MRC scale. The final regression model (Table 4) shows that this model predicts 55, 2% (p < .001) of the variability.
Table 4

Results of Linear Regression analysis (stepwise method) with Stress (HSRS) as dependent variable and NHP, SGRQ, MRC and MOS as independent variables

 

UnSd Coeff.

Sd Coeff.

    

MODEL

B

SE

Beta

t

(p)

R

R2

(Constant)

150,074

7,905

-

18,985

0,000*

0,490

0,240

· HNP Pain

0.741

0.188

0.490

3.931

0.000*

  

(Constant)

207,651

25,299

-

8,208

0,000*

0,566

0,320

· NHP Pain

0.835

0.184

0.552

4.529

0.000*

  

· MRC

−19.832

8.317

−0.290

−2.385

0.021*

  

(Constant)

198,739

24,341

-

8,165

0,000*

0,631

0,398

· NHP Pain

0,639

0,192

0,423

3,322

0,002*

  

· MRC

−30,416

9,010

−0,446

−3,376

0,001*

  

· Impact (SGRQ)

0,981

0,399

0,356

2,456

0,018*

  

(Constant)

195,336

22,422

-

8,712

0,000*

0,708

0,501

· NHP(Pain)

0,500

0,183

0,331

2,738

0,009*

  

· MRC

−30,114

8,290

−0,441

−3,633

0,001*

  

· Impact (SGRQ)

1,485

0,402

0,538

3,692

0,001*

  

· Social Isolation(NHP)

−0,787

0,255

−0,361

−3,086

0,003*

  

(Constant)

244,436

30,583

-

7,993

0,000*

0,743

0,552

· NHP(Pain)

0,335

0,190

0,222

1,768

0,084

  

· MRC

−31,424

7,966

−0,460

−3,945

0,000*

  

· Impact (SGRQ)

1,523

0,386

0,552

3,948

0,000*

  

· Social Isolation(NHP)

−0,915

0,251

−0,420

−3,648

0,001*

  

· Positive Social Interaction (MOS)

−2,908

1,289

−0,256

−2,256

0,029*

  

*p < 0.05.

Discussion

Stress is a mental and physical strain due to threats, danger, life changes and everyday challenges. Our study shows that COPD patients hospitalized in this chronic hospital perceived hospitalization as a little stressing event, contrary to prior literature findings already exposed. However, these hospitalized chronic patients were exposed to potentially stressing factors and suffered from the same effects of routine and protocols, consolidated throughout their history in these institutions[5, 6] which can affect disease evolution and prognosis. Our analysis confirms that, in COPD patients, the most powerful stress factors were related to environmental factors (for example remaining in the same room and sleeping in a bed different from the habitual one); however, in previous studies, these items occupied the last positions in hospitalized patients in general hospitals[5, 18, 19].

One factor that seems important to explain these results is the chronic condition and previous experiences of our patients. Studies by Becker[35] and Gamarra[36] clearly differentiate acute patients from chronic patients, establishing that in the latter ones the increase in care demands and the necessity to be protected become a high-priority for them. Specially elderly hospitalized COPD patients need continuous health care and consider the hospital for chronic patients as a place with high protection against the consequences of their disease. In fact, our results show that patients with a lesser degree of dyspnoea and more self-care independence, reported the greatest stress levels and patients with severe dyspnoea were less affected by hospital routine[37].

HRQOL and social support

A descriptive study of specific HRQOL for COPD shows that, on the whole, this was impaired in COPD patients. However, patients with a worse HRQOL experienced more stress during hospitalization than those who presented a better HRQOL.

Conclusions

We believe that our study adds evidence to the association between stress during hospitalization and factors like pain, psychological impact of the disease, dyspnoea, social isolation and social positive interaction in COPD patients. These factors are shown to be good predictors of the stress during hospitalization. Our findings are consistent with the studies by Fernandez et al[38], McCathie et al[39] and Martin et al[40] while providing new insights into the psychological complications that may occur in patients with low levels of social support during hospitalization.

However, our study presents several limitations. Firstly, the sample size was relatively small, due to the difficulties to include elderly, clinically stable patients and difficulties for exhaustive psychological evaluation in a restricted context. Secondly, there are few research papers and too old scientific evidence that examine stress factors both in general and in patients with COPD.

Abbreviations

COPD: 

Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

HRQOL: 

Health Related Quality of Life

HSRS: 

Hospital Stress Rating Scale

NHP: 

Nottingham Health Profile

SGRQ: 

St. George’s Respiratory Questionnaire

WT: 

Walking Test.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors would like to thank Dr. Joan B Soriano, MD, PhD, Head of Program of Epidemiology and Clinical Research of the Caubet-CimeraFundation (Balearic Islands) for his assistance in the review and translation of this manuscript.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Psychology Department, Joan March Hospital,Ib-Salut
(2)
Psychology Department, University of the Balearic Islands
(3)
Department of Respiratory Nursing, Joan March Hospital, Ib-Salut
(4)
Department of Respiratory Medicine, Joan March Hospital, Ib-Salut

References

  1. Barr DP: Hazards of modern diagnosis and therapy, the price we pay. JAMA. 1955, 159: 1452-56.View Article
  2. Schimmel EM: The hazards of hospitalization. Ann Intern Med. 1964, 60: 100-110.View ArticlePubMed
  3. Barnes E: People in Hospital. 1961, London, United Kingdom: The Macmillan Company
  4. Mathew KV: Emotional aspects of hospitalized patients. J Chr Med As Ind. 1962, 37: 632-636.
  5. Volicer BJ, Bohannon MW: A hospital stress rating scale. Nurs Res. 1975, 24: 352-9.PubMed
  6. Kendal PC: Procedimientos médicos que generan estrés, estrategias cognitivo-conductuales para el control del estrés. Prevención y reducción del estrés. Edited by: Meichembaum y D, Jarenko ME. 1987, Bilbao: DDB
  7. Ferrer-Pérez V, Fornés J, GonzáIez-Barrón R, Manassero-Más MA: Factorialización de la escala HSRS de Volicer v Bohannon en una muestra española. 1992, Comunication: Iberoamerican Congress of Psychology
  8. Volicer BJ, Burns MW: Preexisting correlates of hospital stress. Nurs Res. 1977, 26: 408-415. 10.1097/00006199-197711000-00005.View ArticlePubMed
  9. Volicer BJ, Isenberg M, Burns MW: Medical surgical differences in hospital stress factors. J Hum Stress. 1977, 3: 3-13.View Article
  10. Rodriguez-Marin J: El impacto psicológico de la hospitalización. An Mod Con. 1986, 12: 421-439.
  11. Rodriguez J, Zurriaga R: Estrés, enfermedad y hospitalización. 1997, Escuela Andaluza de Salud Pública: Granada
  12. Volicer BJ, Volicer L: Cardiovascular changes associated with stress during hospitalization. J Psychosom Res. 1978, 22: 159-168. 10.1016/0022-3999(78)90019-3.View ArticlePubMed
  13. Monsinjon P: The psychosocial consequences of illness and hospitalization. Cardiology. 1985, 33: 37-48.
  14. Tagliacozzo DM, Ima K: Knowledge of illness as a predictor of patient behavior. J Chron Dis. 1970, 22: 765-75. 10.1016/0021-9681(70)90052-4.View ArticlePubMed
  15. Taylor SE: Health Psychology. 1986, Nueva York: Random House
  16. Feedland K, Rich M, Skala J, Carney R, Davila-Roman V, Jaffe A: Prevalence of depression in hospitalized patients with congestive heart failure. Psychosom Med. 2003, 65: 119-128. 10.1097/01.PSY.0000038938.67401.85.View Article
  17. Van Servellen GM, Lewis CE, Leake BD: Nurses’ knowledge, attitudes, and fears about AIDS. J Nur Sci Prac. 1988, 1: 1-7.
  18. Carr JA, Powers MJ: Stressors associated with coronary bypass surgery. Nurs Res. 1986, 35: 243-246.View ArticlePubMed
  19. Ricard M, Cabrero J, Reig A: Hospitalización y estrés en el paciente, percepción diferencial de estresores entre paciente y personal de enfermería. An Mod Con. 1993, 19: 75-85.
  20. Gudmundsson G, Gislason T, Janson C, Lindberg E, Hallin R, Ulrik CS, Brøndum E, Nieminen MM, Aine T, Bakke P: Risk factors for rehospitalisation in COPD: role of health status, anxiety and depression. Eur Respir J. 2005, 26: 414-419. 10.1183/09031936.05.00078504.View ArticlePubMed
  21. Reardon JZ, Lareau SC, Zuwallack R: Functional status and Quality of life in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Am J Med. 2006, 119 (10 Suppl 1): 32-7.View ArticlePubMed
  22. Kohler CL, Fish LG, Greene PG: The relationship of perceived self-efficacy to quality of life in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Health Psychol. 2002, 21: 610-614.View ArticlePubMed
  23. Emery C, Shermer C, Hauck R, Hsiao E, MacIntyre E, Neil R: Cognitive and psychological outcomes of exercise in a 1-year follow-up study of patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Health Psyc. 2003, 22: 598-604.View Article
  24. De Voogd JM, Sanderman R, Postema K, Sonderen E, Wempe JB: Relationship between anxiety and dyspnea on exertion in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. An St Cop. 2011, 24: 439-449.
  25. Andenaes R, Kalfoss MH, Wahl AK: Coping and psychological distress in hospitalized patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Heart Lung. 2006, 35: 46-57. 10.1016/j.hrtlng.2005.09.009.View ArticlePubMed
  26. Andenaes R, Moum T, Kalfoss MH, Wahl AK: Changes in health status, psychological distress and Quality of life in COPD patients after hospitalization. Qual Life Res. 2006, 15: 249-57. 10.1007/s11136-005-0890-7.View ArticlePubMed
  27. Medinas-Amorós M, Mas-Tous C, Truyols M, Alorda C, Martín B: Estrés en el hospital sociosanitario: principales factores iatrogénicos en pacientes con enfermedad respiratoria crónica. Ans Estr. 2009, 15: 167-179.
  28. Fletcher CM: Standardized questionnaire on respiratory symptoms: a statement prepared and approved by the MRC Committee on the Aetiology of Chronic Bronchitis (MRC breathlessness score). BMJ. 1960, 2: 1665-
  29. Charlson ME, Pompei P, Ales KL, MacKenzie CR: A new method of classifying prognostic comorbidity in longitudinal studies: development and validation. J Chronic Dis. 1987, 40: 373-383. 10.1016/0021-9681(87)90171-8.View ArticlePubMed
  30. Hunt SM, McEwen J: The development of a subjective health indicator. Sociol Heal Ill. 1983, 2: 231-45.View Article
  31. Alonso J, Antó JM, Moreno C: Spanish version of the Nottingham Health Profile: translation and preliminary validity. Am J Public Health. 1990, 80: 704-708. 10.2105/AJPH.80.6.704.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMed
  32. Jones P, Quirck F, Baveystock C: The St. George’s respiratory questionnaire. Respir Med. 1991, 85 (suppl. B): 25-31.View ArticlePubMed
  33. Ferrer M, Alonso J, Prieto L, Plaza V, Monsó E, Marrades R, Aguar MC, Khala A, Antó JM: Validity and reliability of the St George’s Respiratory Questionnaire after adaptation to a different language and culture: the Spanish example. Eur Resp J. 1996, 9: 1160-1166. 10.1183/09031936.96.09061160.View Article
  34. Sherbourne CD, Stewart AL: The MOS social support survey. Soc Sci Med. 1991, 32: 705-714. 10.1016/0277-9536(91)90150-B.View ArticlePubMed
  35. Becker PM, McVey U: Hospital acquired complications in a randomized controlled trial of a geriatric consultation team. JAMA. 1987, 257: 231-7.View Article
  36. Gamarra-Samaniego P: Consecuencias de la hospitalización en el anciano. Bol Soc Per Med Int. 2003, 14: 3-16.
  37. Elías M, Ortega F, Sánchez R, Otero R, Gil R, Motemayor T: Papel de la disnea en la calidad de vida del paciente con Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica. Arch Bronc. 1999, 35: 261-266.View Article
  38. Fernández AM, Bujalance MJ, Leiva F, Martos F, García AJ, Sánchez de la Cuesta F: Salud autopercibida, apoyo social y familiar de los pacientes con enfermedad pulmonar obstructiva crónica. Aten Pri. 2001, 28: 579-589.View Article
  39. McCathie F, Spence S, Tate RL: Adjustment to chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: the importance of psychological factors. Eur Respir J. 2002, 19: 47-53. 10.1183/09031936.02.00240702.View ArticlePubMed
  40. Martin M, Grünendahl M, Martin P: Age differences in stress, social resources, and well-being in middle and older age. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2001, 56: 214-222. 10.1093/geronb/56.4.P214.View Article

Copyright

© Medinas-Amorós et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2012

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://​creativecommons.​org/​licenses/​by/​2.​0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement