Open Access

Bibliometric analysis of worldwide publications on multi-, extensively, and totally drug – resistant tuberculosis (2006–2015)

  • Waleed M. Sweileh1Email author,
  • Adham S. AbuTaha1,
  • Ansam F. Sawalha1,
  • Suleiman Al-Khalil2,
  • Samah W. Al-Jabi3 and
  • Sa’ed H. Zyoud3
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine201711:45

DOI: 10.1186/s40248-016-0081-0

Received: 27 August 2016

Accepted: 25 November 2016

Published: 11 January 2017

Abstract

Background

The year 2015 marked the end of United Nations Millennium Development Goals which was aimed at halting and reversing worldwide tuberculosis (TB). The emergence of drug resistance is a major challenge for worldwide TB control. The aim of this study was to give a bibliometric overview of publications on multi-, extensively, and totally drug-resistant TB.

Methods

Scopus database was used to retrieve articles on multidrug resistant (MDR), extensively drug-resistant (XDR), and totally drug-resistant (TDR) tuberculosis for the study period (2006–2015). The number of publications, top productive countries and institutions, citation analysis, co-authorships, international collaboration, active authors, and active journals were retrieved and analyzed.

Results

A total of 2260 journal articles were retrieved. The mean ± SD citations per article was 7.04 ± 16.0. The h-index of retrieved data was 76. The number of publications showed a three – fold increase over the study period compared with less than two – fold increase in tuberculosis research during the same study period. Stratified by number of publications, the United States of America ranked first while Switzerland ranked first in productivity per 100 million people, and South Africa ranked first in productivity stratified per one trillion Gross Domestic Product. Three of the High Burden Countries (HBC) MDR-TB (India, China, and South Africa) were present in top productive countries. High percentage of international collaboration was seen among most HBC MDR-TB. Except for Plos One journal, most active journals in publishing articles on MDR, XDR, TDR-TB were in infection – related fields and in general medicine. Top 20 cited articles were published in prestigious journal such as Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine. The themes in top 20 cited articles were diverse, ranging from molecular biology, diagnostic tools, co-infection with HIV, and results of new anti-TB drugs.

Conclusion

Publications on MDR, XDR and TDR – TB are increasing in the past decade. International collaboration was common. Many low resourced African and Asian countries will benefit from research leading to new diagnostic and screening technology of TB. The exchange of expertise, ideas and technology is of paramount importance in this field.

Keywords

Tuberculosis Drug Resistance Bibliometrics

Background

Tuberculosis (TB) is considered a top infectious disease killer worldwide making it a major public health problem [1, 2]. Global Tuberculosis Report, published by World Health Organization (WHO), stated that in 2014, TB killed 1.5 million people [3]. The year 2015 marked the end of United Nations Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) which was aimed at halting and reversing worldwide TB, malaria and human immunodeficiency virus (HIV). Despite the continuous and slow decline in TB, there are still few challenges confronting the control of TB. Association of TB with poverty, co-infection with HIV, and emergence of TB drug resistance are major challenges for worldwide TB control [2]. Antimicrobial resistance (AMR), in general, is a global challenge that threatens the clinical benefit of many important antimicrobial agents and requires an immediate action for containment and reversal [4]. In case of TB, three serious types of drug resistant TB have been identified: (1) multidrug-resistant TB (MDR-TB) which is a TB with resistance to at least isoniazid and rifampicin; (2) extensively drug-resistant TB (XDR-TB), which is a form of MDR-TB that is resistant to isoniazid and rifampin, plus any fluoroquinolone and at least one of three injectable second-line drugs (i.e., amikacin, kanamycin, or capreomycin) [5, 6]; and finally, total drug-resistant TB (TDR) in which Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains are resistant to all first and second line anti-TB agents [710].

In 2014, MDR-TB was responsible for the death of 190,000 people and it is predicted that if all TB cases identified in 2014 were tested for drug resistance, a total of 300,000 patients would carry MDR-TB. More than half (54%) of these patients are living in India, China and Russian Federation [3]. Treatment and control of TB requires the availability of effective drug therapy which in turn requires understanding the pattern of growth and development of resistance of Mycobacterium tuberculosis to first line drug therapy. The WHO has developed the concept of “High Burden Country” (HBC) to emphasize the health burden and to facilitate the understanding of global TB burden post 2015 era. The HBC MDR -TB list includes 20 HBC countries in terms of absolute numbers of cases and an additional 10 countries with the most severe burden in terms of case rates per capita that do not already appear in the “top 20” [3, 11].

Research on drug resistance is a key element for future planning to eliminate TB since the progress made on halting TB in the past two decades could be undermined by the development of drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis [12]. This requires evaluation and analysis of published research on resistant TB and where we will stand on this issue in the future. Publications on TB and the contribution of various countries to these publications have been studied through bibliometric studies [1317]. However, no such studies, that the author is aware of, have described the bibliometrics of drug resistant TB in general and MDR, XDR, and TDR-Tb in specific. In fact, one of the components of Stop TB Strategy and End TB Strategy is intensified research and innovation [3].

Bibliometrics is a statistical method used to analyze and assess various aspects related to the topic of interest [18]. Such aspects include contribution of countries, core journals, most active researchers, international collaboration, annual growth of publications, and top cited articles in the field [19]. This study was carried out as an effort to shed light on a challenging worldwide problem facing the future target to end TB. The objective of this study was to retrieve and analyze worldwide publications on MDR, XDR and TDR-TB for the past decade (2006 – 2015). In this study, bibliometric indicators for data extracted from Scopus database will be presented and gaps pertaining to knowledge about research activity on MDR, XDR and TDR-TB will be filled.

Methods

The methodology used in this study has been described in previously published bibliometric studies [2028]. Several electronic databases can be used to carry out bibliometric studies. Scopus database has been selected to perform this study because it has several advantages over other databases [29]. Scopus includes larger number of journals than either Pubmed or Web of Science. Furthermore, Scopus allows a wide range and more accurate data analysis than either Pubmed or Google scholar [30].

In this study, data were retrieved using keywords in article title to maximize accuracy of the results. The keywords used in this study were obtained partially from previous review articles on MDR-TB [31]. The use of keywords in title-abstract search will yield a high percentage of false positive results. However, the use of keywords in title search only will minimize false positive results. Figure 1 shows a scheme that includes search queries used and the number of retrieved articles in each step.
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40248-016-0081-0/MediaObjects/40248_2016_81_Fig1_HTML.gif
Fig. 1

Scheme showing steps of search strategy with keywords used and numbers of articles retrieved in each step

In search query shown in Fig. 1, the asterisk was used after some keywords as a wild card to retrieve all words relevant to the keyword of interest. The duration of study was set from 2006 to 2015. The study period represents one decade. During this period reports of MDR, XDR, and TDR-TB has emerged strongly. The retrieved documents were limited to journal articles while books and book chapters were excluded. No exclusion was made based on language of the document.

The validity of search strategy was tested by manually reviewing a random sample of 20% of retrieved articles. Validity was confirmed when all randomly tested articles were related to MDR, XDR or TDR-TB. The validation test confirmed that there were minimum false positive results in retrieved documents. Three articles that were false positive were excluded using the function “AND NOT” as appeared in the search query (Fig. 1). However, false negative results remain a possibility especially when the search query was based on title search only. The author, with the help of experts in data management, tried at least five different scenarios of search queries using different search strategies, and the ultimate results in all scenarios had large numbers of false positive results with no significant addition of true articles on MDR, XDR, and TDR-TB. Therefore, the use of the current search query will avoid large numbers of false positive articles but will miss very few true articles.

The growth of research on MDR, XDR, and TDR - TB was presented graphically using Statistical Package for Social Sciences (SPSS). The contribution of countries and institutions/organizations was limited to top ten or those with a minimum productivity of 20 articles. Productivity of HBC TDR-TB was also presented. The standard competition ranking (SCR) was used to rank top ten productive countries, institutions, and authors. Data pertaining to productivity by countries was also stratified with population size and Gross Domestic Product (GDP). For each country, the total number of population and GDP were obtained from World Bank website. To calculate the productivity of each country stratified by population size, we divided the number of publications by the population size of that country. Similarly, to calculate the productivity stratified by GDP, we divided the number of publications by GDP of that country. For population size, productivity was calculated per 100 million inhabitants while for GDP, productivity was calculated per one trillion GDP.

Scopus can be used to provide analysis on international collaboration by counting number of articles published by authors from the same country and articles with authors from different countries. In other words, there are two types of articles: single country publications (SCP) in which all authors belong to the same country and such publications represent intra-country collaboration; and multiple country publications (MCP) in which authors belong to different countries and such publications represent inter-country collaboration i.e. international collaboration.

Quality of publications is difficult to measure or assess directly. However, total number of citations received, average number of citations per article, Hirsch-index (h-index), percentage of highly cited articles, and impact factor (IF) of journals can be used as an indirect measure of publication impact or quality. H-index has been developed to assess productivity and citation impact of researchers. However, the use of h-index has been extended to measure the productivity and citation impact of countries and academic institutions [32]. In this study, h-indexes for countries and institutions were obtained directly from Scopus database while IF was obtained from Journal Citation Report 2015 published by Thomson Reuters. To visualize country collaboration and co-authorships, VOSviewer was used [33]. VOSviewer can present information either as density visualizations or network visualizations maps.

Ethical approval of this study was not required by IRB since no human subjects or data were involved. All data analysis was carried out on November 13th, 2016 to avoid the dynamics of citations from 1 day to another.

Results

General information

Two thousand two hundred sixty journal articles were retrieved. The majority of retrieved documents were research articles (1612; 71.3%). Other types of retrieved documents are shown in Table 1. English (2047; 90.57%) was the most commonly encountered language followed by Spanish (49; 2.17%) and Chinese (45; 2.0%). The total number of citations received was 35,661 (mean ± SD = 7.04 ± 16.0; median (Q1-Q3) = 3(0–7)) while h-index was 76. The highest number of publications was recorded in 2015 with a total of 342, while the lowest number of publications was recorded in 2006 with a total number of 116. This represents a threefold increase in number of publications. Figure 2 shows the growth of publications on the past four decades while Fig. 3 shows the growth of publications on tuberculosis in general and on MDR, XDR, and TDR resistance in particular in the past decade. The growth of publications on TB showed less than two- fold increase in the past decade while the growth of publications on MDR, XDR, and TDR – TB showed approximately three – fold increase.
Table 1

Types of retreived documents (2006 – 2015)

Type of document

Frequency

%

N = 2260

Article

1612

71.33

Review

216

9.56

Letter

215

9.51

Editorial

85

3.76

Note

65

2.88

Article in Press

27

1.19

Short Survey

22

0.97

Conference Paper

18

0.80

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40248-016-0081-0/MediaObjects/40248_2016_81_Fig2_HTML.gif
Fig. 2

Growth of publications on MDR, XDR and TDR-TB in the past four decades

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40248-016-0081-0/MediaObjects/40248_2016_81_Fig3_HTML.gif
Fig. 3

Growth of worldwide publications on TB and on MDR, XDR, TDR-TB during the past decade

Country analysis

Authors from 124 different countries contributed to retrieved documents. The United States of America (USA) ranked first in the number of publications followed by India, South Africa, and the United Kingdom (UK). Table 2 shows the list of all countries that contributed to publications. There was a total of 243 (10.7%) articles with undefined affiliation. These articles include one or more authors with missing country affiliation or country affiliation of certain authors is not being updated by Scopus system at the date of data analysis. Table 3 shows the list of top 10 productive countries. The top 10 list included five European countries plus the USA, India, China, South Korea, and South Africa. Netherlands ranked 11th and was outside the top 10 active list.
Table 2

List of all countries contributing to retreived data (2006 – 2015)

Country

Frequency

%

N = 2260

Country

Frequency

%

N = 2260

Country

Frequency

%

N = 2260

Country

Frequency

%

N = 2260

USA

517

22.88

Argentina

29

1.28

Zambia

7

0.31

Azerbaijan

2

0.09

India

269

11.90

Belarus

19

0.84

Austria

6

0.27

Central African Republic

2

0.09

South Africa

229

10.13

Denmark

19

0.84

Burkina Faso

6

0.27

Cuba

2

0.09

UK

186

8.23

Viet Nam

18

0.80

Cote d’Ivoire

6

0.27

Ecuador

2

0.09

China

158

6.99

Georgia

15

0.66

Lesotho

6

0.27

Jamaica

2

0.09

France

122

5.40

Poland

15

0.66

Botswana

5

0.22

Mozambique

2

0.09

Switzerland

117

5.18

Colombia

14

0.62

Bulgaria

5

0.22

Palestine

2

0.09

South Korea

102

4.51

Czech Republic

13

0.58

Cambodia

5

0.22

Sudan

2

0.09

Italy

100

4.42

Ethiopia

13

0.58

Chile

5

0.22

Swaziland

2

0.09

Germany

91

4.03

Romania

13

0.58

Egypt

5

0.22

Tunisia

2

0.09

Netherlands

85

3.76

Bangladesh

12

0.53

Guadeloupe

5

0.22

Venezuela

2

0.09

Spain

73

3.23

Singapore

12

0.53

Haiti

5

0.22

Albania

1

0.04

Peru

69

3.05

Malaysia

11

0.49

Lithuania

5

0.22

Croatia

1

0.04

Iran

64

2.83

Gambia

10

0.44

Mongolia

5

0.22

Djibouti

1

0.04

Belgium

62

2.74

Hungary

10

0.44

Congo

4

0.18

Dominican Republic

1

0.04

Japan

61

2.70

Namibia

10

0.44

Iceland

4

0.18

Micronesia

1

0.04

Sweden

56

2.48

Uganda

10

0.44

Ireland

4

0.18

French Guiana

1

0.04

Brazil

51

2.26

Ukraine

10

0.44

Kazakhstan

4

0.18

Ghana

1

0.04

Russian Federation

51

2.26

Kuwait

9

0.40

New Zealand

4

0.18

Guinea-Bissau

1

0.04

Portugal

48

2.12

Moldova

9

0.40

Algeria

3

0.13

Jordan

1

0.04

Australia

44

1.95

Nigeria

9

0.40

Armenia

3

0.13

Laos

1

0.04

Pakistan

43

1.90

Saudi Arabia

9

0.40

Benin

3

0.13

Lebanon

1

0.04

Taiwan

42

1.86

Greece

8

0.35

Cameroon

3

0.13

Oman

1

0.04

Thailand

40

1.77

Nepal

8

0.35

Finland

3

0.13

Puerto Rico

1

0.04

Mexico

36

1.59

Norway

8

0.35

Gabon

3

0.13

Rwanda

1

0.04

Canada

35

1.55

Tanzania

8

0.35

Honduras

3

0.13

Saint Kitts and Nevis

1

0.04

Estonia

32

1.42

Indonesia

7

0.31

Iraq

3

0.13

Slovenia

1

0.04

Latvia

32

1.42

Israel

7

0.31

Madagascar

3

0.13

Somalia

1

0.04

Turkey

32

1.42

Kenya

7

0.31

Malawi

3

0.13

Togo

1

0.04

Philippines

31

1.37

Luxembourg

7

0.31

Morocco

3

0.13

UAE

1

0.04

Hong Kong

30

1.33

Uzbekistan

7

0.31

Panama

3

0.13

Undefined

243

10.75

Table 3

Top ten productive countries along with their international collaboration and citation analysis (2006–2015)

SCR

Country

Frequency

%

N = 2260

TC

C/A

h-index

NCC

SCP

%

TC

C/A

h-index

MCP

%

TC

C/A

h-index

1st

USA

517

22.88

15,483

29.95

61

75

147

28.43

3153

21.45

30

370

71.57

12,330

33.32

52

2nd

India

269

11.90

3341

12.42

29

39

216

80.30

1805

8.36

21

53

19.70

1536

28.98

18

3rd

S. Africa

229

10.13

8380

36.59

40

50

45

19.65

555

12.33

12

184

80.35

7825

42.53

39

4th

UK

186

8.23

4608

24.77

33

69

38

20.43

336

8.84

11

148

79.57

4272

28.86

33

5th

China

158

6.99

1460

9.24

19

30

110

69.62

713

6.48

16

48

30.38

747

15.56

13

6th

France

122

5.40

3116

25.54

25

74

33

27.05

327

9.91

9

89

72.95

2789

31.34

24

7th

Switzerland

117

5.18

5766

49.28

37

63

22

18.80

1015

46.14

10

95

81.20

4751

50.01

33

8th

S. Korea

102

4.51

3004

29.45

25

37

73

71.57

1161

15.90

19

29

28.43

1843

63.55

15

9th

Italy

100

4.42

3515

35.15

32

52

25

25.00

199

7.96

9

75

75.00

3316

44.21

31

10th

Germany

91

4.03

2837

31.18

28

55

21

23.08

132

6.29

5

70

76.92

2705

38.64

22

SCR standard competition rank

TC total citations

C/A number of citations per article. It is calculated by dividing the total number of citations by total number of publications retrieved for the assigned country

NCC number of collaborating countries

SCP single country publications (intra country collaboration)

MCP multiple country publications (inter country collaboration)

h-index Hirsh index

USA United States of America

UK United Kingdom

S. Africa South Africa

S. Korea South Korea

When top productive countries were stratified by number of citations per article, Switzerland ranked first followed by South Africa and Italy. Publications from India and China had the lowest number of citations per article. Articles produced by international collaboration (MCP) had higher number of citations per article compared with articles produced without international collaboration (SCP). This indicates that international collaboration is important in increasing number of citations. Interestingly, countries with the lowest percentage of international collaboration, such as China and India, had the lowest number of citations per article. When data for top ten countries were stratified by population size, Switzerland ranked first followed by South Africa and the UK (Table 4). When data were stratified based on GDP, South Africa ranked first followed by Switzerland and India.
Table 4

Productivity of top ten active countries stratified by population size and GDP

SCR

Country

Frequency

%

N = 2260

Number of population in millions

Number of articles per 100 million populationa(R)

GDP in trillions

Number of articles per one trillion GDPb (R)

1st

USA

517

22.88

321.4

160.86 (7)

17.95

28.80 (9)

2nd

India

269

11.90

1311

20.52 (9)

2.074

131.41 (3)

3rd

S. Africa

229

10.13

54.96

416.67 (2)

0.3128

731.63 (1)

4th

UK

186

8.23

65.14

285.54 (3)

2.849

65.29 (4)

5th

China

158

6.99

1371

11.52 (10)

10.87

14.54 (10)

6th

France

122

5.40

66.81

182.61 (5)

2.422

50.37 (7)

7th

Switzerland

117

5.18

8.287

1411.85 (1)

0.6647

175.94 (2)

8th

S. Korea

102

4.51

50.81

200.79 (4)

1.929

55.19 (5)

9th

Italy

100

4.42

60.80

164.47 (6)

1.815

55.10 (6)

10th

Germany

91

4.03

81.41

111.78 (8)

3.356

27.12 (8)

SCR Standard competition rank

USA United States of America

UK United Kingdom

S. Africa South Africa

S. Korea South Korea

R rank

GDP Gross Domestic Product

MDR, XDR, and TDR-TB multi-, extensively, and totally drug resistant tuberculosis

acalculated by dividing number of publications for a particular country by its population size then multiplying by 100

bcalculated by dividing the number of publications of a particular country by its GDP in trillions

Visualization of international collaboration among countries with a minimum productivity of twenty documents is shown in Fig. 4. Visualization map shows the extent and strength of international collaboration between any two countries. The extent of international collaboration for any country is assessed by the size of circle assigned for that country while the strength of collaboration between any two countries is assessed by the thickness of the line connecting the two countries. Strong collaborations were found between the following pairs of countries: USA – South Africa (link strength = 109), USA – Peru (link strength = 47), South Africa – UK (link strength = 42), USA – Switzerland (link strength = 42), USA – UK (link strength = 36), USA – Russian Federation (link strength = 30). USA – South Korea (link strength = 26), USA – China (link strength = 24), USA – Latvia (link strength = 25), and UK – Germany (link strength = 23).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40248-016-0081-0/MediaObjects/40248_2016_81_Fig4_HTML.gif
Fig. 4

Network visualization map of country co-authorships. Legend: Countries with a minimum of 20 published articles were included. The map includes 32 countries in three clusters. Number of co-authorships was highest for the USA followed by South Africa and the UK. Strong collaborations were found between the following pairs of countries: USA – South Africa (link strength = 109), USA – Peru (link strength = 47), South Africa – UK (link strength = 42), USA – Switzerland (link strength = 42), USA – UK (link strength = 36), USA – Russian Federation (link strength = 30). USA – South Korea (link strength = 26), USA – China (link strength = 24), USA – Latvia (link strength = 25), and UK – Germany (link strength = 23)

Productivity from HBC MDR-TB

Three of HBC (India, China, and South Africa) were in the top ten list. On the other hand, seven HBC (N. Korea, Myanmar, Angola, Kyrgyzstan, Papua New Guinea, Tajikistan, and Zimbabwe) had no contribution at all. The remaining HBC (20 countries) were shown in Table 5. The majority of contributing HBC MDR-TB had more than 40% of their publications produced through international collaboration. The exception was Indonesia. The total number of publications produced by HBC MDR-TB, including China, India, and South Africa, was 914 articles. The growth of publications from HBC MDR-TB was almost parallel to worldwide productivity (Fig. 5). However, the gap between the two curves get narrower with time and the growth rate of publications from HBC MDR-TB exceeded that of the worldwide productivity in the last few years. This is due to research productivity from China, India, and South Africa which are considered within the HBC MDR-TB. In 2006, productivity from HBC MDR-TB was almost one forth that of worldwide while in 2015 the productivity of HBC MDR-TB became half that of worldwide. Poisson regression model showed that productivity from HBC MDR-TB was a significant predictor (p < 0.001) of worldwide productivity. The model indicated that for each article produced from HBC MDR-TB, the worldwide productivity increased by 1.01.
Table 5

Productivity of HBC MDR-TB along with their citation analysis and international collaboration

Countrya

Frequency

(%)

N = 2260

TC

C/A

h-index

NCC

SCP

% of SCP

MCP

% of MCP

  

Top HBC MDR-TB countries by estimated absolute number (in alphabetical order)

 

Bangladesh

12

0.53

294

24.50

6

7

5

41.67

7

58.33

DR Congo

4

0.18

9

2.25

2

5

0

0.00

4

100.00

Ethiopia

13

0.58

172

13.23

6

6

7

53.85

6

46.15

Indonesia

7

0.31

14

2.00

2

5

5

71.43

2

28.57

Kazakhstan

4

0.18

9

2.25

1

1

0

0.00

4

100.00

Kenya

7

0.31

309

44.14

4

14

2

28.57

5

71.43

Mozambique

2

0.09

295

147.50

2

5

0

0.00

2

100.00

Nigeria

9

0.40

32

3.56

3

9

4

44.44

5

55.56

Pakistan

43

1.90

283

6.58

11

29

25

58.14

18

41.86

Philippines

31

1.37

1705

55.00

14

33

5

16.13

26

83.87

Russian F.

51

2.26

1983

38.88

23

36

8

15.69

43

84.31

Thailand

40

1.77

815

20.38

12

29

18

45.00

22

55.00

Ukraine

10

0.44

61

6.10

6

18

3

30.00

7

70.00

Uzbekistan

7

0.31

189

27.00

5

11

0

0.00

7

100.00

Viet Nam

18

0.80

514

28.56

8

28

3

16.67

15

83.33

  

Countries with the highest number of TB case rates per capita

 

Azerbaijan

2

0.09

443

221.50

1

9

0

0.00

2

100.00

Belarus

19

0.84

469

24.68

9

33

0

0.00

19

100.00

Peru

69

3.05

2501

36.25

21

28

9

13.04

60

86.96

Moldova

9

0.40

108

12.00

7

22

0

0.00

9

100.00

Somalia

1

0.04

8

8.00

1

3

0

0.00

1

100.00

HBC MDR-TB High Burden Countries with Multidrug Resistant Tuberculosis

TC total citations

C/A average number of citations per article. It is calculated by dividing the total number of citations by total number of publications retrieved for the assigned country

NCC number of collaborating countries

SCP single country publications (intra country collaboration)

MCP multiple country publications (inter country collaboration)

h-index Hirsh index

aCountries were listed alphabetically. Countries that were listed in top ten list were not listed in this table: China, India, and South Africa. The following countries have zero contribution: N. Korea, Myanmar, Angola, Kyrgyzstan, Papua New Guinea, Tajikistan, Zimbabwe

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40248-016-0081-0/MediaObjects/40248_2016_81_Fig5_HTML.gif
Fig. 5

Growth of publications from HBC MDR-TB (green line) compared with worldwide productivity (2006–2015). Key: Green line: HBC MDR-TB productivity. Blue line: Worldwide productivity

Institutions/ Organizations

Top ten productive institutions/ organizations are shown in Table 6. The WHO ranked first followed by Centers for Disease Prevention and Control (CDC) and Harvard Medical School. The total productivity from Harvard Medical School and Harvard School of Public Health was 98 articles which is greater than that of CDC and lower than that of WHO. The top list included five American institutions/ organizations, three South African, two Italian, and one international organization (WHO). The impact of publications from top ten productive institutions/ organizations was assessed indirectly by the percentage of highly cited articles for each institutions/ organization. Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University (USA) ranked first in the percentage of highly cited articles followed equally by the two Italian institutions, Università degli Studi di Sassari, and IRCCS Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri.
Table 6

Top ten active institutions/ organizations in MDR, XDR, and TDR-TB publications (2006–2015)

SCRa

Institution/ Organization

Country

Frequency

%

N = 2260

HCA

% of HCAb

1st

Organisation Mondiale de la Sante

WHO

104

4.60

35

33.65

2nd

Centers for Disease Control and Prevention

CDC (USA)

89

3.94

31

34.83

3rd

Brigham and Women’s Hospital

USA

74

3.27

18

24.32

4th

Harvard Medical School

USA

73

3.23

20

27.40

5th

Universiteit Stellenbosch

S. Africa

61

2.70

23

37.70

6th

University of Cape Town

S. Africa

54

2.39

16

29.63

7th

Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University

USA

44

1.95

25

56.82

8th

South African Medical Research Council

S. Africa

43

1.90

17

39.53

9th

Universita degli Studi di Sassari

Italy

42

1.86

18

42.86

9th

IRCCS Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri

Italy

42

1.86

18

42.86

9th

Partners in Health

USA

42

1.86

12

28.57

aSCR: standard competition rank. Equal countries were given the same ranking number, and then a gap is left in the ranking numbers

bHCA: number of highly cited articles. Articles with ≥ 30 citations were considered HCA. Percentage of HCA was calculated by dividing total number of HCA by total number of publications for each institution/ organization assigned

Journals

Journals publishing at least 20 articles on MDR, XDR, TDR-TB are shown in Table 7. The total number of publications produced by journals in the list was 975 (43.14%) with a total IF of 7494.27 which gives an average of 7.68 per article. The International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Diseases ranked first followed by PloS One. Most journals in the list have IF. PloS One journal was the only multidisciplinary journal present in the list. The other ones in the list were within the scope of infection and general medicine. Lancet and New England Journal of Medicine (NEJM) had the highest IF and both are in general medicine. The top list included one Chinese and one Japanese journal while the remaining journals are Europeans or American ones.
Table 7

Journals publishing at least 20 articles on MDR, XDR, and TDR – TB (2006–2015)

Journal

Country

Frequency

%

IF

TIF

International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease

France

212

9.38

2.315

490.78

Plos One

USA

123

5.44

3.54

435.42

European Respiratory Journal

Switzerland

81

3.58

8.332

674.892

Emerging Infectious Diseases

USA

61

2.70

6.99

426.39

Journal of Clinical Microbiology

USA

54

2.39

3.993

215.622

Clinical Infectious Diseases

USA

50

2.21

8.736

436.8

Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy

USA

41

1.81

3.34

136.94

Lancet

UK

41

1.81

44.002

1804.082

Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy

UK

38

1.68

4.919

186.922

BMC Infectious Diseases

UK

37

1.64

2.690

99.53

International Journal of Mycobacteriology

USA

37

1.64

N/A

0

Indian Journal of Tuberculosis

India

30

1.33

N/A

0

Lancet Infectious Diseases

UK

27

1.19

21.371

577.017

American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine

USA

26

1.15

13.118

341.068

International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents

Netherlands

26

1.15

4.079

106.054

New England Journal of Medicine

USA

25

1.11

59.558

1488.95

Tuberculosis

USA

25

1.11

2.952

73.8

Kekkaku

Japan

21

0.93

N/A

0

Chinese Journal of Tuberculosis and Respiratory Diseases

China

20

0.88

N/A

0

  

975 (43.14%)

  

7494.267

IF impact factor

TIF total impact factor obtained by multiplying the impact factor of the journal by the number of articles published by that journal = 7494.267

Citation analysis of most productive journals is depicted as a network visualization map (Fig. 6). International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease had the highest number of citations followed by PloS One and European Respiratory Journal. The number of citations is correlated with the circle size assigned for the journal. Co-citation analysis for most productive journals is shown in Fig. 7. Journals with a minimum of 200 citations were included. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease is commonly co-cited with Lancet (link strength = 6842), Journal of Clinical Microbiology (link strength = 5767), Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (link strength = 5052), NEJM (link strength = 5161), Clinical Infectious Disease (link strength = 4882), and American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (link strength = 4515).
https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40248-016-0081-0/MediaObjects/40248_2016_81_Fig6_HTML.gif
Fig. 6

Network visualization map of journal citations. Legend: Journals with a minimum of 20 articles published on MDR, XDR, TDR-TB were included. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease had the highest number of citations followed by European Respiratory Journal and PloS One. The number of citations is correlated with the circle size assigned for the journal

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40248-016-0081-0/MediaObjects/40248_2016_81_Fig7_HTML.gif
Fig. 7

Journal co-citation analysis. Legend: Journals with a minimum of 200 citations were included. Twenty journals are shown in the network visualization map to make the map readable and less crowded. International Journal of Tuberculosis and Lung Disease is commonly co-cited with Lancet (link strength = 6842), Journal of Clinical Microbiology (link strength = 5767), Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy (link strength = 5052), NEJM (link strength = 5161), Clinical Infectious Disease (link strength = 4882), and American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine (link strength = 4515)

Authors

A total of 8246 authors contributed to the publications, giving an average of 3.65 authors per article. Authors who had published at least 20 articles are shown in Table 8. The list included five authors from the USA, three authors from Italy, three authors from Iran, two authors from South Africa, two from WHO, one from China, one from Latvia, one from Germany, one from Switzerland, one from Sweden, and one with two affiliations, USA/ UAE. Author collaboration among top active authors is depicted in Fig. 8. Examples of strong collaboration were seen among the following authors: Migliori, G.B. - Sotgiu, G. (link strength = 37), Migliori, G.B. - Centis, R. (link strength = 37), Mitnick, C.D. - Becerra, M.C. (link strength = 22), Migliori, G.B. - Lange, C. (link strength = 22), Sotgiu, G. - Centis, R. (link strength = 25), Mitnick, C.D. - Bayona, J. (link strength = 16), and Masjedi, M.R. - Farnia, P. (link strength = 17). The strength of collaboration is relative to the thickness of connection between any two researchers. Authors with similar circle color are considered a cluster, i.e. have close collaboration.
Table 8

Top active authors with a minimum contribution of 20 articles (2006 – 2015)

Author

Frequency

%

N = 2260

Affiliation as appeared in Scopus profile

Migliori, G.B.

63

2.79

IRCCS Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri, Pavia, Italy

Mitnick, C.D.

36

1.59

Partners in Health, Boston, United States

Sotgiu, G.

42

1.86

Universita degli Studi di Sassari, Department of Biomedical Sciences, Sassari, Italy

Becerra, M.C.

29

1.28

Harvard Medical School, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Boston, United States

Keshavjee, S.

31

1.37

Harvard Medical School Center for Global Health Delivery, Dubai, United Arab Emirates

Centis, R.

39

1.73

IRCCS Fondazione Salvatore Maugeri, Pavia, Italy

Bayona, J.

25

1.11

Harvard Medical School, Department of Global Health and Social Medicine, Boston, United States

Farnia, P.

25

1.11

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Gandhi, N.R.

27

1.19

Rollins School of Public Health, Atlanta, United States

Leimane, V.

26

1.15

Riga East University Hospital, Riga, Latvia

Masjedi, M.R.

25

1.11

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Chronic Respiratory Disease Research Center, Tehran, Iran

Yew, W.W.

26

1.15

Chinese University of Hong Kong, Stanley Ho Centre for Emerging Infectious Diseases, Hong Kong, China

Zignol, M.

24

1.06

Organisation Mondiale de la Sante, Global TB Programme, Geneve, Switzerland

Lange, C.

27

1.19

Forschungszentrum Borstel - Zentrum fur Medizin und Biowissenschaften, Borstel, Germany

Padayatchi, N.

25

1.11

Centre for the AIDS Programme of Research in South Africa, Congella, South Africa

Tabarsi, P.

23

1.02

Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran

Victor, T.C.

20

0.88

Universiteit Stellenbosch, Division of Molecular Biology and Human Genetics, Stellenbosch, South Africa

Koh, W.J.

22

0.97

SungKyunKwan University, School of Medicine, Department of Medicine, Suwon, South Korea

D’Ambrosio, L.

20

0.88

Public Health Consulting Group, Lugano, Switzerland

Falzon, D.

20

0.88

Organisation Mondiale de la Sante, Global TB Programme, Geneve, Switzerland

Hoffner, S.

20

0.88

Karolinska University Hospital, Department of Microbiology, Tumor and Cell Biology, Stockholm, Sweden

Shah, N.S.

20

0.88

Albert Einstein College of Medicine of Yeshiva University, Department of Medicine, New York, United States

https://static-content.springer.com/image/art%3A10.1186%2Fs40248-016-0081-0/MediaObjects/40248_2016_81_Fig8_HTML.gif
Fig. 8

Network visualization for author co-authorships (collaboration). Legend: Authors with a minimum productivity of 20 articles were included. Examples of strong collaboration were seen among the following authors: Migliori, G.B. - Sotgiu, G. (link strength = 37), Migliori, G.B. - Centis, R. (link strength = 37), Mitnick, C.D. - Becerra, M.C. (link strength = 22), Migliori, G.B. - Lange, C. (link strength = 22), Sotgiu, G. - Centis, R. (link strength = 25), Mitnick, C.D. - Bayona, J. (link strength = 16), and Masjedi, M.R. - Farnia, P. (link strength = 17). The strength of collaboration is relative to the thickness of connection between any two researchers. Authors with similar circle color are considered a cluster, i.e. have close collaboration

Highly cited articles

Table 9 shows the top 20 highly cites articles. The highest number of citations obtained was 1069. The article titled “Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis as a cause of death in patients co-infected with tuberculosis and HIV in a rural area of South Africa” received the highest number of citations. Four articles from the top 20 cited articles were published in NEJM, three articles were published in Lancet, and two were published in Lancet Infectious Diseases. The topics covered in highly cited articles range from general public health impact of MDR, XDR, TDR-TB to results of newly approved drugs for treatment of MDR-TB. The top 20 cited articles included five review articles, one conference paper, one letter, one short survey, and the remaining were research articles.
Table 9

Top highly cited articles on MDR, XDR, TDR-TB (2006–2015)

Reference

Number of citations

Document Type

Reference

Number of citations

Document Type

[53]

1069

Article

[54]

264

Article

[55]

587

Review

[56]

262

Article

[57]

443

Article

[58]

261

Article

[59]

435

Review

[60]

257

Short Survey

[61]

424

Article

[62]

253

Letter

[63]

374

Article

[64]

246

Review

[65]

340

Article

[66]

236

Article

[67]

297

Review

[68]

226

Article

[7]

290

Article

[69]

219

Article

[70]

284

Conference Paper

[71]

214

Review

Discussion

In this study, a bibliometric overview of publications on MDR, XDR, and TDR-TB was presented. Our study showed a steady increase on worldwide publications on MDR, XDR and TDR-TB suggesting that this problem is a global health problem and can be a public health burden if the current situation continues as is [34, 35]. The value of h-index of retrieved articles in the past decade supports the fact that this problem is spreading and is being cited heavily in the literature. Analysis of Scopus database for articles with keywords pertaining to infectious diseases showed six fold increase in the number of publications from 2006 to 2015. Therefore, it is possible that part of the increase in MDR, XDR, and TDR-TB publications is due to the overall growth of publications with time in the field of infections and infectious diseases. However, analysis of Scopus database for publications in the past decade showed that the number of publications on TB was less than doubled in the past decade while the number of publications on TB resistance had increased by more than three folds in the past decade suggesting that resistance is increasing at a rate higher than that of TB in general.

According to Global Tuberculosis Report 2015, a total of approximately 10 million incident cases of TB were recorded in 2014, mostly in Asia and Africa [3, 36]. This explains the presence of China, India, South Korea and South Africa in the top ten productive countries. A study in China found that 25% of surveyed TB patients had TB that was resistant to isoniazid, rifampin, or both, and 1 out of 10 had MDR tuberculosis [37]. Reports from India about MDR, XDR and TDR –TB have been published that raises calls of immediate response by Indian medical community [38]. South Africa has also reported many cases of MDR, XDR and TDR-TB [39, 40]. The Global Tuberculosis Report further explains that 11–13% of new incident tuberculosis cases in 2014 were among HIV positive people. This might explain the presence of two articles in the most cited list that discuss tuberculosis and MDR in HIV patients. Actually, a study has reported that tuberculosis, drug abuse, HIV, and MDR-TB are devastating epidemics in some countries in Asia and urgent action is needed [41]. Our study showed that three countries of HBC MDR-TB ranked among the top ten active countries. In general, the publication from HBC MDR-TB was parallel to that of worldwide productivity suggesting that there is a real interest and concern regarding this subject. Out of the twenty HBC MDR-TB, Russian Federation and Peru had noticeable contribution. Russian Federation is considered by the WHO as one of 30 countries described as HBC TB [42].

International collaboration was common among most countries in the top productive countries. Despite that initiation of successful collaboration between Western rich countries and some poor countries with high TB prevalence has been reported [43], countries like China, India and South Korea where TB and TB-resistant cases are found showed lower international collaboration in TB drug resistance research. It could be the language barrier particularly for Chinese and Korean scientists. Other possible explanations include lack of collaboration between these countries and European and American countries in most other medical research fields. Collaboration among authors in different countries is important in advancing science and in combating TB through exchange of expertise and knowledge. A study indicated that public – private collaboration can produce successful detection and therapy of TB cases [44]. Another study indicated that governmental – NGOs collaboration in poor countries like Bangladesh is an effective strategy in detection and eradication of TB [45]. Antimicrobial resistance is a true challenge for international efforts to stop and reverse TB worldwide [46]. Preparing for this challenge requires collaboration, use of advanced molecular biology techniques, development of new pharmaceuticals, and worldwide research activity on TB.

Exploration of the top ten cited articles on MDR, EDR and TDR-TB reveals much to be planned for in this regard. It is true that TB is a major single killer among all infectious diseases, but co-infection of TB with HIV makes the prognosis even worse which requires the availability of potent anti-TB drugs and combating development of resistance to these drugs to promote better prognosis for patients co-infected with HIV and TB. Some authors described the presence of HIV and MDR-TB as a perfect storm with disastrous consequences [47]. Effective diagnostic tools for screening and early detection of TB and MDR-TB is an important strategy in combating drug resistant TB [48, 49]. The development of such cost-effective diagnostic techniques is urgent given that the majority of TB patients have no access to drug-resistance screening to optimize their therapy [49]. No wonder that an article about the feasibility and efficacy of a diagnostic techniques was among top ten cited articles [48]. One more important of concern in drug – resistant TB global public health challenge is the search for new drugs to overcome reported MDR-TB. One such drug is diarylquinoline TMC207 which is still under clinical investigation for MDR-TB cases [50].

No doubt that drug resistance TB deserves a lot of research and the scientific community needs to be aware where worldwide research on this topic is standing. Our study is being strong in the fact that it is the first to give a bibliometric overview on MDR, XDR and TDR – TB publications. However, missing some articles is a possibility due to unindexed journal publication or accuracy of search strategy despite that the authors have done their best to avoid false negative and false positive results as described in the methodology. Furthermore, the use of title search strategy instead of title/abstract strategy created some pros and cons. Title search strategy created minimum false positive results, but might create some false negative results that need to be taken into consideration. No bibliometric study is 100% accurate and perfect and it is always a snapshot of the current situation based on certain keywords used in data collection. In addition, no electronic database is considered perfect for data collection. System updates, different affiliations, different name spelling, and sometimes missing data can be found in electronic databases commonly used in bibliometric studies. Finally, it should be emphasized that definitions pertaining to resistance terminology are not standardized. However, the definitions presented in this study are the most common ones. Limitations in this study are similar in nature to those present and listed in most bibliometric studies [2128]. Despite all these limitations, this study was meant to fill gap in literature and knowledge on MDR, XDR, and TDR –TB in general hoping that this study will be of value to those in the field. Furthermore, this is the first bibliometric study on MDR, XDR, and TDR-TB despite that several bibliometric studies on TB were carried out [51, 52].

Conclusions

Our study showed that publications on MDR, XDR and TDR – TB have increased in the past decade. The majority of articles on MDR, XDR and TDR-TB were published in journals with high IF, suggestive of importance of the topic to clinicians and researchers. Search for feasible, accurate, cost effective diagnostic tests, and new anti TB drugs are hot topics in this field. International collaboration in this field was evident for most countries. The exchange of expertise, ideas and technology is of paramount importance in this field especially that TB is common in poor countries that lack these expertise.

Abbreviations

WHO: 

World Health Organization

CDC: 

Centers for Disease Prevention and Control

TB: 

Tuberculosis

MDR: 

Multidrug resistant

XDR: 

Extensively resistant or extremely resistant

TDR: 

Totally resistant

HBC: 

High burden countries

HBC-TB: 

High burden courtiers – tuberculosis

HBC MDR-TB: 

High burden countries with multidrug resistant tuberculosis

Declarations

Acknowledgement

None.

Funding

None.

Availability of data and materials

All data present in this article can be retrieved from Scopus using keywords listed in the methodology.

Authors’ contributions

All authors were involved in drafting the article, and all authors approved the final version to be submitted for publication. WMS conceptualized, designed the study, and performed the statistical analyses.

Authors’ information

Professor Waleed M. Sweileh is a distinguished Professor of Clinical Pharmacology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences at An-Najah National University.

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Ethics approval and consent to participate

Not applicable.

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Department of Pharmacology/ Toxicology, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University
(2)
Department of Anatomy, Biochemistry and Genetics, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University
(3)
Department of Clinical and Community Pharmacy, College of Medicine and Health Sciences, An-Najah National University

References

  1. Glaziou P, Sismanidis C, Floyd K, Raviglione M. Global epidemiology of tuberculosis. Cold Spring Harb Perspect Med. 2014;5(2):a017798.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Sulis G, Roggi A, Matteelli A, Raviglione MC. Tuberculosis: epidemiology and control. Mediterr J Hematol Infect Dis. 2014;6(1):e2014070.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  3. World Health Organization. Global tuberculosis report 2015. 2015 [cited 2016 August 25]; Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/191102/1/9789241565059_eng.pdf. Accessed 25 Nov 2016.
  4. World Health Organization. Antimicrobial resistance: global report on surveillance. 2014 [cited 2016 August 25]; Available from: http://apps.who.int/iris/bitstream/10665/112642/1/9789241564748_eng.pdf. Accessed 25 Nov 2016.
  5. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC). Multidrug resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). 2016 [cited 2016 August 25]; Available from: http://www.cdc.gov/tb/publications/factsheets/drtb/mdrtb.htm. Accessed 25 Nov 2016.
  6. Millard J, Ugarte-Gil C, Moore DA. Multidrug resistant tuberculosis. BMJ. 2015;350:h882.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Velayati AA, Masjedi MR, Farnia P, Tabarsi P, Ghanavi J, Ziazarifi AH, et al. Emergence of new forms of totally drug-resistant tuberculosis bacilli: Super extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis or totally drug-resistant strains in Iran. Chest. 2009;136(2):420–5.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Udwadia ZF. MDR, XDR, TDR tuberculosis: ominous progression. Thorax. 2012;67(4):286–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Velayati AA, Farnia P, Masjedi MR. The totally drug resistant tuberculosis (TDR-TB). Int J Clin Exp Med. 2013;6(4):307–9.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  10. Migliori G, De Iaco G, Besozzi G, Centis R, Cirillo DM. First tuberculosis cases in Italy resistant to all tested drugs. Euro Surveill. 2007;12(5):E070517.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Organization, W.H. Use of high burden country lists for TB by WHO in the post-2015 era. Geneva: WHO; 2015.Google Scholar
  12. Matteelli A, Migliori GB, Cirillo D, Centis R, Girard E, Raviglion M. Multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis: epidemiology and control. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2007;5(5):857–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  13. Ramos JM, Padilla S, Masiá M, Gutiérrez F. A bibliometric analysis of tuberculosis research indexed in PubMed, 1997–2006. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2008;12(12):1461–8.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Arunachalam S, Gunasekaran S. Tuberculosis research in India and China: From bibliometrics to research policy. Curr Sci. 2002;82(8):933–47.Google Scholar
  15. Gupta B, Bala A. Mapping of tuberculosis research in India: a scientometric analysis of publications output during 1998–2009. COLLNET Journal of Scientometrics and Information management. 2011;5(1):33–51.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  16. Jeyshankar, R. and P. Ganesan, Research Output of Scientist of Tuberculosis Research Centre (TRC), Chennai, Tamil Nadu: A Scientometric Study. Indian J Inf Sources Serv (IJISS). 2011;1(2).
  17. Mori T. Trends of tuberculosis researches in Japan and the roles of Kekkaku. Kekkaku. 2009;84(7):519–22.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Thompson DF, Walker CK. A descriptive and historical review of bibliometrics with applications to medical sciences. Pharmacotherapy. 2015;35(6):551–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Sweileh WM, Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sawalha AF. Assessing urology and nephrology research activity in Arab countries using ISI web of science bibliometric database. BMC Res Notes. 2014;7(1):258.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  20. Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM, Waring WS. Scientific research related to calcium channel blockers poisoning: Bibliometric analysis in Scopus, 1968–2012. Hum Exp Toxicol. 2015;34(11):1162–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Sweileh WM, Shraim NY, Al-Jabi SW, Sawalha AF, Rahhal B, Khayyat RA, et al. Assessing worldwide research activity on probiotics in pediatrics using Scopus database: 1994–2014. World Allergy Organ J. 2016;9:25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  22. Sweileh WM, Shraim NY, Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW. Worldwide research productivity on tramadol: a bibliometric analysis. Springerplus. 2016;5(1):1108.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  23. Sweileh WM, Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sawalha AF. Contribution of Arab countries to breast cancer research: comparison with non-Arab Middle Eastern countries. BMC Womens Health. 2015;15:25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  24. Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM. Scientific publications from Arab world in leading journals of Integrative and Complementary Medicine: a bibliometric analysis. BMC Complement Altern Med. 2015;15:308.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  25. Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM, Al-Khalil S, Alqub M, Awang R. Global methaemoglobinaemia research output (1940–2013): a bibliometric analysis. Springerplus. 2015;4:626.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  26. Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM, Al-Khalil S, Zyoud SH, Sawalha AF, et al. The Arab world’s contribution to solid waste literature: a bibliometric analysis. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2015;10:35.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  27. Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM, Awang R, Waring WS. Bibliometric profile of the global scientific research on methanol poisoning (1902–2012). J Occup Med Toxicol. 2015;10:17.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  28. Zyoud SH, Zyoud SH, Al-Jabi SW, Sweileh WM, Awang R. Contribution of Arab countries to pharmaceutical wastewater literature: a bibliometric and comparative analysis of research output. Ann Occup Environ Med. 2016;28:28.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  29. Bakkalbasi N, Bauer K, Glover J, Wang L. Three options for citation tracking: Google Scholar, Scopus and Web of Science. Biomed Digit Libr. 2006;29(3):7.
  30. Falagas ME, Pitsouni EI, Malietzis GA, Pappas G. Comparison of PubMed, Scopus, web of science, and Google scholar: strengths and weaknesses. FASEB J. 2008;22(2):338–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Johnston JC, Shahidi NC, Sadatsafavi M, Fitzgerald JM. Treatment outcomes of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2009;4(9):e6914.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  32. Hirsch JE. An index to quantify an individual’s scientific research output. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2005;102(46):16569–72.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  33. van Eck NJ, Waltman L. Software survey: VOSviewer, a computer program for bibliometric mapping. Scientometrics. 2010;84(2):523–38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Zemlyanaya N, et al. Estimating costs for treating patients with multi-drug resistant tuberculosis (MDR TB) under the regional tuberculosis control program, Tomsk (Russia). Eur Respir J. 2015;46 Suppl 59:PA2703.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  35. Chung-Delgado K, Guillen-Bravo S, Revilla-Montag A, Bernabe-Ortiz A. Mortality among MDR-TB cases: comparison with drug-susceptible tuberculosis and associated factors. PLoS One. 2015;10(3):e0119332.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  36. Calver AD, Falmer AA, Murray M, Strauss OJ, Streicher EM, et al. Emergence of increased resistance and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis despite treatment adherence, South Africa. Emerg Infect Dis. 2010;16(2):264–71.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Zhao Y, Xu S, Wang L, Chin DP, Wang S, Jiang G, et al. National survey of drug-resistant tuberculosis in China. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(23):2161–70.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Thomas A, Joseph P, Nair D, Rao DV, Rekha VV, Selvakumar N, et al. Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: experience at the Tuberculosis Research Centre, Chennai, India. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2011;15(10):1323–5.
  39. Streicher EM, Müller B, Chihota V, Mlambo C, Tait M, Pillay M, et al. Emergence and treatment of multidrug resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) tuberculosis in South Africa. Infect Genet Evol. 2012;12(4):686–94.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Chihota VN, Müller B, Mlambo CK, Pillay M, Tait M, Streicher EM, et al. Population structure of multi- and extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis strains in South Africa. J Clin Microbiol. 2012;50(3):995–1002.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  41. Schluger NW, El-Bassel N, Hermosilla S, Terlikbayeva A, Darisheva M, Aifah A, et al. Tuberculosis, drug use and HIV infection in Central Asia: an urgent need for attention. Drug Alcohol Depend. 2013;132:S32–6.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. World Health Organization. Use of high burden country lists for TB by WHO in the post-2015 era: Summary. 2015 [cited 2016 August 12]; Available from: http://www.who.int/tb/publications/global_report/high_tb_burdencountrylists2016-2020summary.pdf.
  43. Enarson DA. Tuberculosis: 12. Global disease and the role of international collaboration. CMAJ. 2000;162(1):57–61.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  44. Malmborg R, Mann G, Thomson R, Squire SB. Can public-private collaboration promote tuberculosis case detection among the poor and vulnerable? Bull World Health Organ. 2006;84(9):752–8.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  45. Zafar Ullah AN, Newell JN, Ahmed JU, Hyder MK, Islam A. Government-NGO collaboration: the case of tuberculosis control in Bangladesh. Health Policy Plan. 2006;21(2):143–55.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Schito M, Maeurer M, Kim P, Hanna D, Zumla A. Translating the Tuberculosis Research Agenda: Much Accomplished, but Much More to Be Done. Clin Infect Dis. 2015;61 Suppl 3:S95–101.View ArticlePubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  47. Wells CD, Cegielski JP, Nelson LJ, Laserson KF, Holtz TH, Finlay A, et al. HIV infection and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: the perfect storm. J Infect Dis. 2007;196 Suppl 1:S86–107.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Steingart KR, Schiller I, Horne DJ, Pai M, Boehme CC, Dendukuri N. Xpert® MTB/RIF assay for pulmonary tuberculosis and rifampicin resistance in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014;21(1):CD009593.
  49. Vassall A, van Kampen S, Sohn H, Michael JS, John KR, den Boon S, et al. Rapid diagnosis of tuberculosis with the Xpert MTB/RIF assay in high burden countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis. PLoS Med. 2011;8(11):e1001120.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  50. Palomino JC, Martin A. TMC207 becomes bedaquiline, a new anti-TB drug. Future Microbiol. 2013;8(9):1071–80.
  51. Maharana RK, AK Das, JK Sahu. Tuberculosis (TB) research in India during 2004–2013: a bibliometric analysis. Libr Philos Pract (e-journal). 2014.
  52. Chen LM, Liu YQ, Shen JN, Peng YL, Xiong TY, Tong X, et al. The 100 top-cited tuberculosis research studies. Int J Tuberc Lung Dis. 2015;19(6):717–22.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  53. Gandhi NR, Moll A, Sturm AW, Pawinski R, Govender T, Lalloo U, et al. Extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis as a cause of death in patients co-infected with tuberculosis and HIV in a rural area of South Africa. Lancet. 2006;368(9547):1575–80.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  54. Barnard M, Albert H, Coetzee G, O'Brien R, Bosman ME. Rapid molecular screening for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in a high-volume public health laboratory in South Africa. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2008;177(7):787–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  55. Centers for Disease Contr\ol and Prevention (CDC). Emergence of mycobacterium tuberculosis with extensive resistance to second-line drugs - Worldwide, 2000–2004. Morb Mortal Wkly Rep. 2006;55(11):301–5.
  56. Gler MT, Skripconoka V, Sanchez-Garavito E, Xiao H, Cabrera-Rivero JL, Vargas-Vasquez DE, et al. Delamanid for multidrug-resistant pulmonary tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(23):2151–60.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  57. Boehme CC, Nicol MP, Nabeta P, Michael JS, Gotuzzo E, Tahirli R, et al. Feasibility, diagnostic accuracy, and effectiveness of decentralised use of the Xpert MTB/RIF test for diagnosis of tuberculosis and multidrug resistance: A multicentre implementation study. Lancet. 2011;377(9776):1495–505.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  58. Mitnick CD, Shin SS, Seung KJ, Rich ML, Atwood SS, Furin JJ, et al. Comprehensive treatment of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 2008;359(6):563–74.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  59. Gandhi NR, Nunn P, Dheda K, Schaaf HS, Zignol M, van Soolingen D, et al. Multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis: a threat to global control of tuberculosis. Lancet. 2010;375(9728):1830–43.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  60. Raviglione MC, Smith IM. XDR tuberculosis - Implications for Global Public Health. N Engl J Med. 2007;356(7):656–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  61. Diacon AH, Pym A, Grobusch M, Patientia R, Rustomjee R, Page-Shipp L, et al. The diarylquinoline TMC207 for multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. N Engl J Med. 2009;360(23):2397–405.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  62. Udwadia ZF, Amale RA, Ajbani KK, Rodrigues C. Totally drug-resistant tuberculosis in India. Clin Infect Dis. 2012;54(4):579–81.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  63. Zignol M, Hosseini MS, Wright A, Weezenbeek CL, Nunn P, Watt CJ, et al. Global incidence of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. J Infect Dis. 2006;194(4):479–85.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  64. Caminero JA, Sotgiu G, Zumla A, Migliori GB. Best drug treatment for multidrug-resistant and extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2010;10(9):621–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  65. Shah NS, Wright A, Bai GH, Barrera L, Boulahbal F, Martín-Casabona N, et al. Worldwide emergence of extensively drug-resistant tuberculosis. Emerg Infect Dis. 2007;13(3):380–7.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  66. Hugonnet JE, Tremblay LW, Boshoff HI, Barry CE 3rd, Blanchard JS. Meropenem-clavulanate is effective against extensively drug-resistant Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Science. 2009;323(5918):1215–8.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  67. Orenstein EW, Basu S, Shah NS, Andrews JR, Friedland GH, Moll AP, et al. Treatment outcomes among patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Infect Dis. 2009;9(3):153–61.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  68. Ling DI, Zwerling AA, Pai M. GenoType MTBDR assays for the diagnosis of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: A meta-analysis. Eur Respir J. 2008;32(5):1165–74.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  69. Van Deun A, Maug AK, Salim MA, Das PK, Sarker MR, Daru P, et al. Short, highly effective, and inexpensive standardized treatment of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182(5):684–92.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  70. Wells CD, Cegielski JP, Nelson LJ, Laserson KF, Holtz TH, Finlay A, et al. HIV infection and multidrug-resistant tuberculosis - The perfect storm. J Infect Dis. 2007;196 Suppl 1:S86–107.
  71. Johnston JC, Shahidi NC, Sadatsafavi M, Fitzgerald JM. Treatment outcomes of multidrug-resistant tuberculosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. PLoS One. 2009;4(9):e6914.

Copyright

© The Author(s). 2016

Advertisement