Skip to main content

Table 3 Phase III RCTs that evaluated efficacy and safety of tiotropium in asthma

From: The evidence on tiotropium bromide in asthma: from the rationale to the bedside

Authors

Year

Main inclusion criteria

Age

Number

Treatment

Duration

Primary outcome

Secondary outcomes

Conclusions

Children and adolescents

 Szefler SJ et al. [133]

2017

FEV1 60–90%pred

ACQ-7 > 1.5 and high dose ICS + 1 controller therapy or medium dose ICS + 2 controller therapies

6–11

392

Add on tiotropium 5 μg, 2.5 μg or placebo to chronic medium dose ICS (200–400 μg budesonide or eq.) + 2 controller or high dose ICS (≥400 μg) plus one controller

12 weeks

Peak FEV1 (0–3 h)

1) Trough FEV1

2) Peak FVC (0–3 h)

3) ACQ–IA score and responder rate

4) trough FVC

5) FEV1AUC (0–3h)

6) rescue medication use

7) time to first exacerbation

8) time to first severe exacerbation

9) ACQ-6 and ACQ-7

10) FEF25–75

11) weekly evening PEF

12) Tolerability

Primary and key secondary outcomes were significantly improved only for tiotropium 5 μg. Peak FVC (0–3 h) and trough FVC did not reach significance for any tiotropium dose.

 Huang J et al. [134]

2016

Moderate persistent asthma

6–14

80

125 μg fluticasone propionate aerosol TD + placebo OD vs 125 μg fluticasone propionate aerosol TD + tiotropium 18 μg dry-powder OD

12 weeks

(not clearly stated)

1) FEV1, FVC and PEF at week 12.

2) Asthma exacerbation

3) Rescue medication use

4) Night time symptoms

5) Tolerability

Tiotropium 18 as add-on to maintenance therapy significantly improved lung function compared to maintenance therapy alone.

 Hamelmann E et al. [131]

2016

FEV1 60–90%pred

ACQ-7 > 1.5 and chronic treatment with ICS (200–800 μg for 12–14 years; 400–800 μg for 15–17 years) +/−LABA +/− LTRA

12–17

376

Add on tiotropium 5 μg, 2.5 μg or placebo to maintenance therapy, with ICS +/− LTRA (LABA not permitted) + open label SABA as rescue medication

48 weeks

Peak FEV1 (0–3 h)

1) Trough FEV1

2) Peak FVC (0–3 h)

3) FVC AUC (0–3h)

4) Trough FVC

5) FEV1AUC (0–3h)

6) time to first exacerbation

7) time to first severe exacerbation

8) ACQ-7 and ACQ-6

9) AQLQ (S) score and responder rate

10) Tolerability

All functional outcomes were significantly improved compared to placebo for all tiotropium doses. Greatest overall benefit was found for tiotropium 5 μg. A trend towards improvements was present for ACQ-7

 Hamelmann E et al. [132]

2016

ACQ-7 > 1.5 and high dose ICS + 1 controller therapy or medium dose ICS + 2 controller therapies

12–17

388

Add on tiotropium 5 μg, 2.5 μg or placebo to chronic ICS plus one or more controller therapies.

12 weeks

Peak FEV1 (0–3 h)

1) Trough FEV1

2) Peak FVC (0–3 h)

3) FVC AUC (0–3h)

4) trough FVC

5) FEV1AUC (0–3h)

6) rescue medication use

7) time to first exacerbation

8) time to first severe exacerbation

9) ACQ-6 and ACQ-7

10) FEF25–75

11) evening and morning PEF

12) Tolerability

Primary and secondary endpoint not met. Numerical greater response with tiotropium 5 μg compared to placebo.

Adults

 Peters SP et al. [137] “TALC study”

2010

Symptomatic despite 160 μg daily beclomethasone with FEV1 < 70%pred

≥18

174

Tiotropium 18 μg + placebo vs beclomethasone 320 μg + placebo vs salmeterol 50 TD + beclomethasone 160 μg + placebo

14 weeks – 3 period

Morning PEF

1) Trough FEV1

2) asthma control days

3) rescue medication use

4) asthma symptoms

5) exacerbations

6) use of health care service

7) inflammatory biomarkers

8) ACQ

9) Tolerability

Tiotropium 18 μg is superior to doubling the ICS dose and non-inferior to salmeterol in patients with uncontrolled asthma

 Wang K et al. [138]

2015

Moderate asthma.

FEV1 60–80%pred, daily use of SABA, PEF and FEV1variability of >30%. ACT 12–20

≥18

94

Add on therapy with tiotropium 18 μg, LTRA or double dose ICS on salmeterol/fluticasone dry-powdre 50/250 μg TD

16 weeks

Asthma control in terms of FeNO; daily PEF variability and ACT score

Not clearly stated

Tiotropium non inferior to doubling doses of ICS. Best response obtained with double dose ICS/LABA but higher risk of pneumonia and RTI.

 Kerstjens HA et al. [139] “PrimoTinA-asthma 1 & PrimoTinA-asthma 2“

2012

Uncontrolled asthma defined with ACQ-7 > 1.5, FEV1 ≤ 80%pred and/or FVC ≤ 70%pred despite chronic treatment with ≥800 μg budesonide + LABA

18–75

912 (456 per study)

Tiotropium 5 μg add on therapy or matching placebo. Teophylline, OCT and LTRA were permitted if part of maintenance therapy along with LABA/ICS.

Two replicate 48 weeks

1) Peak FEV1 (0–3 h)

2) Trough FEV1 (24 weeks).

3) Time to first exacerbation (48 weeks)

At each visit:

1) Trough FEV1

2) Peak FEV1

4) trough FVC

5) Peak FVC

6) FEV1AUC (0–3h)

7) FVC AUC (0–3h)

8) time to first exacerbation

9) morning and evening PEF

10) asthma symptoms

11) ACQ-7 and AQLQ

12) Tolerability

Add on treatment with tiotropium to ICS/LABA sustained bronchodilation over 24 h, reduces severe exacerbations and episodes of worsening of disease.

Improvements in asthma control scores and other secondary outcomes were not met.

 Kerstjens HA et al. [141] “MezzoTinA-asthma 1 & MezzoTinA-asthma 2“

2015

Uncontrolled asthma defined with ACQ-7 > 1.5, FEV1 60–90%pred despite chronic treatment with 400–800 μg budesonide or eq. +/− LABA or SABA

18–75

1972 (998 & 974 per study)

Tiotropium 5 μg, 2.5 μg, salmeterol 50 μg TD or placebo as add on therapy to 400–800 μg of budesonide or eq.

Two replicate 24 weeks

1) Peak FEV1 (0–3 h)

2) Trough FEV1 (24 weeks).

3) ACQ-7 responder rate

1) trough FVC

2) Peak FVC

3) morning weekly PEF

4) ACQ-7

5) time to first exacerbation

6) Tolerability

Add on treatment with tiotropium significantly improves lung function and asthma control compared with placebo, and has similar efficacy and tolerability to salmeterol

 Paggiaro P et al. [142]

2016

Uncontrolled asthma defined with ACQ-7 > 1.5, FEV1 60–90%pred despite chronic treatment with 200–400 μg budesonide or eq.

18–75

464

Tiotropium 5 μg or tiotropium 2.5 μg or placebo as add on treatment to chronic low to medium ICS.

12 week

Peak FEV1 (0–3 h)

1) Trough FEV1

2) FEV1AUC (0–3h)

3) Use of rescue medication

4) ACQ-7

5) morning and evening PEF

6) Safety

Both doses of tiotropium were significantly superior to placebo for every lung function outcome. No effect size retrieved. No difference in reduction of ACQ-7 score between active and placebo groups.

  1. Phase III RCTs that evaluated efficacy and safety of different doses of tiotropium in patients with moderate to severe uncontrolled asthma. RCTs are divided according to the study sample age. N  number of patients randomized to treatment, ACQ-IA Interviewer-Administered version of the Asthma Control Questionnaire, RTI respiratory Tract Infections, FeNO Exhaled Fraction of Nitric Oxide, %pred percent predicted, eq. equivalent. For other abbreviations please see text. In all trials adverse effects were not different between groups if not otherwise reported. For other abbreviations, please see text