From: Role of guaifenesin in the management of chronic bronchitis and upper respiratory tract infections
First Author (Year) | Objectives of study | Intervention | Results |
---|---|---|---|
Robinson (1977) | To confirm that guaifenesin was superior to placebo in facilitating expectoration of sputum and ameliorating dry cough in patients with an acute upper respiratory infection | Randomized double-blind parallel-group study: 200 mg guaifenesin in 10-mL doses vs placebo, 4× daily for 3 days | Subjective measures compared to placebo: • Cough frequency reduced at 48 h, 72 h (all: p < 0.01) • Cough intensity reduced at 48 h, 72 h (all: p < 0.01) • Chest discomfort reduced at 24 h, 48 h, 72 h (all: p < 0.01) • Sputum volume increased (only in patients with productive cough) at 48 h (p < 0.01) • Ease of raising sputum increased at 24 h, 48 h, 72 h (all: p < 0.01) |
Kuhn (1982) | To evaluate the efficacy of guaifenesin in reducing cough frequency in adults with acute respiratory disease | Double-blind study: 2400 mg guaifenesin vs placebo syrup vehicle in 30-mL doses every 6 h for 30 h | • Objective cough counts: No significant differences between guaifenesin and placebo • Significantly greater decrease in sputum viscosity compared to baseline in patients with productive cough (p = 0.001) • Greater decrease in sputum quantity (p = 0.07) |
Albrecht (2012) | Pilot study to determine the efficacy of extended-release (ER) guaifenesin with placebo for treatment of URTI, using objective and subjective efficacy assessments | Randomized double-blind study: 1200 mg ER guaifenesin vs placebo 2× daily for 7 days | Subjective measures of efficacy (patient-reported outcomes; PROs) showed the most prominent differences between treatment groups at Day 4, in favor of guaifenesin. Based on post-hoc analyses focusing on subsets of these PROs, an 8-question PRO tool (SUM8) was validated. |