Open Access

Pulmonary function testing and chest tomography in patients with acromegaly

  • Gustavo Bittencourt Camilo1,
  • Fernando Silva Guimarães2,
  • Débora Pedroza Guedes Silva2,
  • Roberto Mogami3,
  • Leandro Kasuki4,
  • Mônica Roberto Gadelha4,
  • Pedro Lopes Melo5 and
  • Agnaldo José Lopes1, 2Email author
Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine20138:70

https://doi.org/10.1186/2049-6958-8-70

Received: 2 September 2013

Accepted: 4 November 2013

Published: 13 November 2013

Abstract

Background

Despite the gradual improvement in treatment procedures and cure rates of acromegaly, a steady increase in the mortality rate due to respiratory disease has been documented in recent decades. In this study, our objectives were to describe the abnormalities in lung structure and function that occur in acromegalic patients and to correlate these changes with hormonal levels.

Methods

This cross-sectional study included 20 acromegalic patients and 20 age-and height-matched control subjects, all non-smokers. All subjects underwent spirometry, whole body plethysmography, carbon monoxide diffusing capacity, and respiratory muscle strength. Acromegalic patients also performed high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT).

Results

Most patients were female (65%), with a mean age of 52.5 ± 13 years. Acromegalic patients showed lower values of maximum expiratory pressure (55.9 ± 17.1 vs. 103.7 ± 19.2%; p < 0.001) and maximum inspiratory pressure (71.4 ± 27.8 vs. 85.3 ± 24.1%; p = 0.005) compared to control subjects. The values of forced vital capacity (107.1 ± 15.9 vs. 98.9 ± 21.4%; p = 0.028), total lung capacity – TLC (107.3 ± 12.9 vs. 93.7 ± 7.60%; p = 0.002), residual volume (114.1 ± 22.7 vs. 90.0 ± 14.6%; p < 0.001), and airways’ resistance (3.82 vs. 2.31 cmH2O/L/s; p = 0.039) were greater in acromegalic patients than in control subjects. The difference between the TLC measured by plethysmography and the VA (alveolar volume) measured during the DLCO maneuver was higher in acromegalic patients than in control subjects (0.69 ± 0.46 vs. 0.19 ± 0.61 L; p = 0.021). The main findings in HRCT in acromegalic patients were air trapping, airway calcification and bronchiectasis, which were observed in 60%, 40% and 35% of cases, respectively. There was no significant correlation between the levels of growth hormone and insulin-like growth factor I, the lung function and the air trapping.

Conclusions

Acromegalic patients show changes consistent with the involvement of the small airways and ventilation inhomogeneity, both in terms of lung function and structure. However, air trapping cannot be explained either by hormone levels or changes in lung function.

Keywords

Acromegaly Respiratory function tests Respiratory mechanics Tomography

Background

Acromegaly is an endocrine disease that results from the systemic consequences of excessive growth hormone (GH) and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I). Its prevalence is approximately 60 cases per million inhabitants, while the incidence is estimated at 3 to 4 cases per million people [1, 2]. Patients with acromegaly show a relative risk of mortality from respiratory disease 1.85 times higher than in general population [3]. Excess GH may lead to severe systemic manifestations, including orthopedic, cardiovascular, and respiratory problems [4, 5].

The mortality rate due to respiratory disease is approximately three times higher in acromegalic patients than in healthy subjects, and respiratory problems also contribute to approximately 25% of all deaths found in this group of patients [3, 69]. Patients with acromegaly develop various respiratory disorders resulting from anatomic distortion of soft tissues, cartilage, muscles, and chest and craniofacial bones. This range of abnormalities produces two primary respiratory alterations, known as obstructive sleep apnea and impaired respiratory function [7, 10, 11].

In acromegaly, the mechanical changes in the respiratory system elastance and the changes in the geometry of respiratory muscles may potentially lead to lung diseases. In these patients, the respiratory muscle strength is altered, the inspiratory time is shortened, the respiratory rate may increase, and subclinical hypoxemia may be present [12]. Despite these alterations, few studies have studied pulmonary function in acromegalic patients [13].

Several studies in acromegalic patients have shown bone and cartilage alterations involving the upper airways and chest wall structures. The axial skeleton is affected in up to 60% patients and includes the thickening of soft and cartilaginous tissues, enlargement of the intervertebral spaces, formation of osteophytes, and kyphoscoliosis [1416]. The changes in the upper airways and chest wall in acromegaly are already well documented using imaging methods. However, to our knowledge, no research has been conducted to detect lung abnormalities using high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) in acromegalic patients. Moreover, expiratory computed tomography (CT) has been proposed as a good method for early diagnosis of the involvement of the small airways in systemic diseases [17, 18].

Although acromegaly is well studied in the context of cardiovascular, metabolic and musculoskeletal disorders, there is still much controversy regarding the changes occurring in the lungs. The use of HRCT and pulmonary function tests may provide key data on possible pulmonary changes that occur in acromegaly. Thus, our objectives were to describe the abnormalities in lung structure and function in acromegalic patients and to correlate these changes with hormonal levels.

Methods

Patients

This cross-sectional study was conducted between June 2012 and March 2013. The study involved 26 subjects with acromegaly (age >18 years) who were followed up at the Clementino Fraga Filho University Hospital of the Federal University of Rio de Janeiro. Diagnoses were based on clinical features and were confirmed by high levels of GH that did not fall below 0.4 ng/mL after an oral glucose tolerance test or IGF-I levels above the upper limit of the age-specific normal range [19, 20].

Patients were considered to have controlled acromegaly when their IGF-I levels were within the age-adjusted reference range and when their baseline GH level was less than 1.0 ng/mL [20]. Patients with a history of smoking and patients with comorbidities unrelated to acromegaly that could interfere in the pulmonary function testing were not included in the study. Untreated hypothyroidism and hypocortisolism were also considered as exclusion criteria. A control group of 20 healthy volunteers of both genders was recruited from the Augusto Motta University Center (UNISUAM). These individuals did not exhibit any history of smoking or evidence of cardiorespiratory disorder.

All participants signed an informed consent form, and the protocol was approved by the Research Ethics Committee of the State University of Rio de Janeiro under number 234.362.

Measurements

The serum concentrations of GH and IGF-I were routinely measured using commercial two-site chemiluminescenceimmunometric assays (Immulite, Diagnostic Product Corporation, Los Angeles, CA, USA). The IGF-I level was assayed by IRMA after ethanol extraction of binding proteins (Diagnostic Systems Laboratories, Webster, TX, USA). The percentage of values that exceeded the age-adjusted normal value of IGF-I (upper limit normal value - ULNV) was calculated, and zero was assigned for normal dosages.

The pulmonary function testing consisted of spirometry, body plethysmograph, carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO), and respiratory muscle strength. Measurements were conducted using an HD CPL (nSpire Health, Inc., Longmont, CO, USA), following standard procedures and interpretation [21]. The pulmonary function testing results were expressed as a percent of the predicted values for the Brazilian population [2225]. Percent of the predicted values outside of the lower limit of normal (LLN) or upper limit of normal (ULN) were considered abnormal. An obstructive ventilatory defect was defined by a forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1)/forced vital capacity (FVC) ratio < LLN [26].

The CT images were recorded in a helical CT scanner with 64 channels (Brilliance 40, Philips Medical Systems, Cleveland, OH, USA). The readout time was set to 4 s, with an X-ray tube current of 458 mA and voltage of 120 kVp. Each image acquisition consisted of a block with 250 to 400 2-mm-thick cross sections separated by 1 mm. The images were represented by a square matrix of 768 rows and 768 columns and were recorded without gantry tilt. In all subjects, both end-inspiratory and end-expiratory scans were obtained. Iodinated contrast agent was not used in any of the examinations. The HRCT scans were interpreted by the consensus of two chest radiologists (R.M. and G.B.C.).

Data analysis

The data distribution was tested using the Shapiro-Wilk test. Comparisons were made using a t-test or Mann–Whitney test. Pearson or Spearman correlation tests were used to assess the associations between variables. The results were expressed as the means and standard deviation or frequencies (percentage). The analyses were performed using the software SigmaStat 3.5 (Systat Software, San Jose, CA, USA). The statistical significance was set at p < 0.05.

Results

Six out of the 26 initially recruited acromegalic patients were excluded for the following reasons: refusal to participate in the study (4) and inability to reach the acceptability criteria in pulmonary function tests (2). Thus, the acromegalic group included 13 women and seven men with a mean age of 52.5 ± 13 years. Four patients (20%) had hypopituitarism, although they were undergoing hormone replacement therapy and had normal hormone levels. Fifteen patients (75%) underwent surgery and five patients (25%) underwent radiation therapy. As to the pulmonary function, an obstructive ventilatory defect was diagnosed in 40% of the cases. The total lung capacity (TLC) and the residual volume (RV) were > ULN in 15% and 30% of the cases, respectively. Conversely, an RV/TLC ratio > ULN was noted in 40% of the patients. The acromegalic patients’ laboratory data and general characteristics are shown in Table 1.
Table 1

General characteristics and laboratory data of 20 acromegalic patients

General characteristics

 

  Age (years)

52.5 ± 13

  Gender (female), n (%)

13 (65)

  Height (cm)

165 ± 0.10

  Weight (kg)

85.8 ± 11.5

  BMI (kg/m2)

31.7 ± 4.02

  Time since diagnosis of disease (months)

101.7 ± 42.6

Laboratory data

 

  GH (μg/L)

2.81 ± 2.78

  IGF-I (μg/L)

416.5 ± 290.9

  IGF-I (% ULNV)

171.8 ± 115.7

Values are means ± SD or numbers (%). BMI, body mass index; GH, growth hormone; IGF-I, insulin-like growth factor I; ULNV, upper limit normal value.

The control group (15 women and five men) had the following anthropometric characteristics: age = 50.9 ± 15.7 years; height = 162 ± 0.09 cm; weight = 71.3 ± 9.94 kg; BMI = 27.2 ± 3.34 kg/m2. There were no significant differences between healthy volunteers and patients with acromegaly regarding age (p = 0.73) and height (p = 0.35). The weight and BMI significantly differed between the two groups (p < 0.001 for both).

Tables 2 and 3 show the comparisons of the pulmonary function parameters between the healthy volunteers and the acromegalic patients (absolute values and percent predicted values). There were statistically significant differences between the values of maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP), maximal expiratory pressure (MEP), FVC, TLC, RV, and airways resistance (Raw). The difference between the TLC measured by plethysmography and the alveolar volume (VA) measured during the DLCO maneuver (TLC-VA difference) was also statistically different between the two groups.
Table 2

Pulmonary function test results in healthy volunteers and acromegalic patients (absolute values)

 

Control group (n = 20)

Acromegaly group (n = 20)

p

FVC (L)

3.27 ± 0.85

3.67 ± 1.03

0.186

FEV1 (L)

2.60 ± 0.65

2.92 ± 0.79

0.168

FEV1/FVC (%)

84.7 ± 3.25

79.8 ± 4.11

0.598

FEF25-75% (L/s)

2.61 ± 0.71

3.08 ± 1.16

0.130

FEF25-75%/FVC (%)

79.4 ± 6.06

83.6 ± 7.93

0.605

MIP (cm H2O)

-81.3 ± 29.4

-63.6 ± 28.9

0.063

MEP (cm H2O)

121 ± 32.9

92.3 ± 30.79

0.001

TLC (L)

4.83 ± 0.98

5.61 ± 1.09

0.023

RV (L)

1.55 ± 0.32

2.04 ± 0.38

<0.001

RV/TLC (%)

32.6 ± 6.89

37.5 ± 8.94

0.063

Raw (cm H2O/L/s)

2.31 ± 0.58

3.82 ± 0.49

0.039

DLCO (ml/min/mm Hg)

22.6 ± 5.66

23.3 ± 6.46

0.713

VA (L)

4.61 ± 1.33

4.92 ± 1.19

0.443

DLCO/VA (ml/min/mm Hg/L)

5.08 ± 1.06

4.72 ± 0.64

0.205

TLC-VA difference (L)

0.19 ± 0.61

0.69 ± 0.46

0.021

Values are means ± SD or numbers (%). DLCO, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, FEF25-75%, forced expiratory flow during the middle half of the FVC; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FVC, forced vital capacity; MEP, maximal expiratory pressure; MIP, maximal inspiratory pressure; Raw, airway resistance; RV, residual volume; TLC, total lung capacity; VA, alveolar volume.

Table 3

Pulmonary function test results in healthy volunteers and acromegalic patients (% predicted values)

 

Control group (n = 20)

Acromegaly group (n = 20)

p

FVC (% predicted)

98.9 ± 21.4

107.1 ± 15.9

0.028

FEV1 (% predicted)

96.2 ± 11.9

104.8 ± 15.5

0.057

FEV1/FVC (% predicted)

97.2 ± 3.30

94.0 ± 4.86

0.572

FEF25-75% (% predicted)

91.5 ± 18.9

105.9 ± 20.1

0.261

FEF25-75%/FVC (% predicted)

95.2 ± 6.77

99.4 ± 7.05

0.630

MIP (% predicted)

85.3 ± 24.1

71.4 ± 27.8

0.005

MEP (% predicted)

103.7 ± 19.2

55.9 ± 17.1

<0.001

TLC (% predicted)

93.7 ± 7.60

107.3 ± 12.9

0.002

RV (% predicted)

90.0 ± 14.6

114.1 ± 22.7

<0.001

RV/TLC (% predicted)

94.9 ± 13.4

107.1 ± 27.2

0.068

DLCO (% predicted)

103.1 ± 13.9

103.7 ± 24.4

0.968

VA (% predicted)

90.5 ± 15.5

93.6 ± 12.2

0.147

DLCO/VA (% predicted)

116.4 ± 22.3

110.2 ± 18.5

0.346

Values are means ± SD or numbers (%). DLCO, diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide, FEF25-75%, forced expiratory flow during the middle half of the FVC; FEV1, forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FVC, forced vital capacity; MEP, maximal expiratory pressure; MIP, maximal inspiratory pressure; Raw, airway resistance; RV, residual volume; TLC, total lung capacity; VA, alveolar volume.

In the group of acromegalic patients, 55% had active disease, while 45% had controlled disease. Although the patients with active disease showed higher mean pulmonary function values in all variables except RV/TLC, no significant differences were found in absolute and percent predicted values between the groups (p > 0.05 for all comparisons).

There was no association between the values of GH, IGF-I (μg/L), and IGF-I (% ULNV) hormone levels and the pulmonary function parameters when using either absolute or percent predicted values (p > 0.05 for all).

The main HRCT findings are shown in Table 4. The main change was air trapping (60% of cases), which was diffuse in 20% of the patients (Figures 1 and 2). When sparse, air trapping was mainly detected in the lower lobes. Other common abnormalities included airway calcification (40% of cases) (Figure 3) and bronchiectasis (35% of cases) (Figure 1).
Table 4

Abnormalities on chest computed tomography in patients with acromegaly

Air trapping

12 (60)

  Located

8 (40)

  Diffuse

4 (20)

Bronchiectasis

7 (35)

Ground-glass opacity

4 (20)

Airway calcification

8 (40)

  Trachea

6 (30)

  Main bronchus

5 (25)

Values are number of cases (%).

Figure 1

Bronchiectasis and air trapping in a 56-year-old man with acromegaly who had an RV value of 126% of predicted and a Raw value of 5.23 cm H 2 O/L/s. (a) Inspiratory, transverse, thin-section CT scan obtained through the lower lung zone shows bronchiectasis (arrows). (b) Expiratory, transverse, thin-section CT scan obtained through the lower lung zone reveals diffuse air trapping (arrowheads).

Figure 2

Air trapping in a 57-year-old man with acromegaly who had a RV value of 173% of predicted and a Raw value of 3.47 cm H 2 O/L/s. (a) Inspiratory, transverse, thin-section CT scan obtained through the lower lung zone shows no abnormal findings. (b) Expiratory, transverse, thin-section CT scan obtained through the lower lung zone reveals diffuse air trapping (arrows).

Figure 3

Airway calcification in a 49-year-old woman with acromegaly who had an RV value of 120% of predicted and a Raw value of 2.95 cm H 2 O/L/s. (a) Axial unenhanced CT scan (mediastinal window) shows tracheal calcifications (arrows). (b) Axial unenhanced CT scan (mediastinal window) shows bronchial calcifications (arrows).

No significant difference was found between the mean values of time since disease diagnosis, GH, IGF-I (μg/L), IGF-I (% ULNV), and pulmonary function parameters (absolute values and percent predicted values) when comparing the two groups according to the presence or absence of air trapping in HRCT.

Discussion

Our study shows that acromegalic patients present with impaired pulmonary function, namely increased static lung volumes, increased TLC-VA difference, and augmented Raw. As to the imaging, air trapping is the most common alteration in those patients. In the lungs, the changes in the structure and function mainly affect the lower airways. To date, no study has focused on this issue in a sample of nonsmoking patients without pulmonary comorbidities.

In the present study, pulmonary function results of the two groups were compared both in absolute values and in percent predicted values. Since acromegalic patients tend to present higher values of body weight, body cell mass and extracellular water [27], we consider that the comparison is best seen as percent of predicted values [21]. We observed an increase in FVC (107.1 ± 15.9 vs. 98.9 ± 21.4%; p = 0.028), TLC (107.3 ± 12.9 vs. 93.7 ± 7.60%; p = 0.002), and RV (114.1 ± 22.7 vs. 90.0 ± 14.6%; p < 0.001) in acromegalic patients compared with the control group. The cause of increased static lung volumes in acromegaly has been discussed in the literature. Some studies indicate increased alveolar size [13, 28], whereas others consider the increased number of alveoli [29, 30]. García-Río et al. [13] noted that the increased lung compliance and reduced lung recoil pressure found in patients with acromegaly were minimized following hormonal control. These data make it unlikely that an increased number of alveoli could explain the increase in lung volume; thus, it would be more plausible to assume an increase in alveolar size in patients with acromegaly.

In the healthy subjects, the VA is essentially the same as the TLC (± 200 mL) and can be used as an estimate of TLC [31]. In the present study, the TLC-VA difference was higher in acromegalic patients than in control subjects (0.69 ± 0.46 vs. 0.19 ± 0.61 L; p = 0.021). Interestingly, the TLC-VA difference provides an estimate of the severity of nonuniform gas distribution, that is the volume of poorly ventilated lung [31, 32]. Thus, it may result from large trapped-gas regions in acromegalic patients. It is noteworthy that the TLC-VA difference in patients with air trapping was higher than in those without air trapping on HRCT despite the absence of statistical significance (0.83 ± 0.52 vs. 0.59 ± 0.40 L; p = 0.268).

We noted an increase in Raw (3.82 ± 0.49 vs. 2.31 ± 0.58 cm H2O/L/s; p = 0.039) in our sample of acromegalic patients compared with the control subjects, in addition to increased RV. The acromegalic patients also showed higher RV/TLC than the control subjects despite the absence of a statistically significant difference (107.1 ± 27.2 vs. 94.9 ± 13.4%; p = 0.068). Interestingly, abnormalities in acromegalic patients’ lower airways have already been investigated by some authors [10, 11]. Harrison et al. [10] noted an increase in Raw in 14 out of 30 acromegalic patients. According to these researchers, the narrowing of small airways can be attributed to vascular congestion of the surrounding lung or even to the accumulation of soft tissues around the small airways. Conversely, Trotman-Dickenson et al. [11] detected lower airway obstruction in eight out of 35 patients. However, both the study by Harrison et al. [10] and that by Trotman-Dickenson et al. [11] included smokers and did not use a control group. Another possible explanation for the involvement of small airways in acromegalic patients is the excessive lung growth because the terminal flows largely depend on lung volume and airways size, and these two variables are interrelated – a phenomenon known as dysanapsis [33, 34]. In the present study, however, the mean value of the forced expiratory flow during the middle half of the FVC (FEF25-75%)/FVC ratio (a measure to estimate dysanapsis) [33] is greater in acromegalic patients than in control subjects despite the absence of statistical significance (99.4 ± 7.05 vs. 95.2 ± 6.77%; p = 0.630). Therefore, it is possible that the highest Rwa in acromegalic patients may only be explained by a loss of elastic tissue of alveoli and small airways.

Acromegaly also affects the function of respiratory muscles [8]. In fact, studies with muscle biopsy have shown segmental muscle fiber degeneration, foci of cellular infiltration, and variable breakdown in both type I and II fibers [35]. We also observed a significant reduction in MEP and MIP values in acromegalic patients compared to normal subjects (55.9 ± 17.1 vs. 103.7 ± 19.2%, p < 0.001; 71.4 ± 27.8 vs. 85.3 ± 24.1, p = 0.005; respectively), corroborating the study by Iandelli et al. [36].

Similarly to other studies [13, 37], we also failed to find significant correlation between the level of GH and pulmonary function. In contrast to animal models, no GH binding site has been found in human lungs thus far. This result suggests that this hormone does not play a direct physiological role in alveolar development and growth [38], which could explain our inability to demonstrate any statistically significant correlation.

Alterations in HRCT have not been previously studied in acromegalic patients. Our study showed the high frequency of air trapping (60%) and bronchiectasis (35%). This finding reinforces the notion that the lower airways are somewhat compromised in these patients. Air trapping is induced by narrowing of airways [18] and is associated with bronchiectasis in some cases [39]. Air trapping, when diffuse (which occurred in 20% of our sample) is always associated with some type of pathological alteration, although it may also be found in healthy subjects [18, 40, 41]. In the present study, we did not observe significant correlations between air trapping and pulmonary function parameters. This suggests that expiratory CT may complement basic evaluations to detect small airways disease in acromegalic patients.

Are there similarities between the 'acromegalic lung’ and the 'senile lung’ from the anatomo-physiological standpoint? Microscopically, lung aging is marked by dilatation of alveoli without signs of destruction of the septa or obvious inflammation [42, 43]. In acromegalic patients an increase in alveolar size presumably occurs due to changes in the elastic properties of the lungs, despite the lack of histopathological studies [8, 13]. In the elderly, there is increased lung compliance and decreased elastic recoil pressure [44, 45]. These findings are also reported in acromegalic patients [13]. The loss of elasticity with aging, along with the loss of support of the small airways, leads to a gradual reduction in the rate of lung emptying [46]. A similar phenomenon presumably also occurs in acromegalic patients, causing changes in the small airways [10, 11]. Interestingly, these findings have also been reported in the HRCT of healthy elderly [18, 47], similarly to the high frequency of air trapping and bronchiectasis that we have shown in the population of acromegalic patients. Lee et al. [18] found air trapping areas in 76% of subjects aged 61 years or older and also noted a statistically significant correlation between air trapping and age (r = 0.523; p < 0.001). These authors believe that occlusion or luminal narrowing of the airways associated with age may occur at the level of the secondary pulmonary lobule, causing the appearance of air trapping areas. It is noteworthy that airway calcification is a finding that appears in both acromegalic patients and elderly [48]. The changes that occur in lung tissues may at least partly explain the link between the 'acromegalic lung’ and the 'senile lung’. In lung tissue, GH is able to increase the synthesis of collagen type I fibers and mucopolysaccharides [49]. Studies in the elderly show a possible reduction of the amount of elastic fibers in the lung parenchyma and a possible increase in collagen, mainly type III collagen [50].

A critical analysis of the results is warranted. Firstly, we didn’t do more refined measurements for the assessment of small airways, including nitrogen washout. These measurements could give greater support to our hypothesis of early lung aging in acromegalic patients. Secondly, we did not measure the static recoil pressure that would allow a greater understanding of respiratory mechanics in these patients. Thirdly, a pairing with a control group in terms of weight and BMI could help in the interpretation of lung function. Some acromegalic patients were obese, which may have also decreased their lung volumes by reducing respiratory system compliance, precluding finding larger differences with healthy controls. Fourthly, the absence of HRCT in healthy controls, (not permitted by the Ethics Committee), does not allow us to say that the finding of air trapping is characteristic of acromegaly. Notwithstanding these limitations, our results indicate the involvement of the lower airways (not just the upper airways) in acromegalic patients, and this involvement was expressed both in terms of lung function and structure. Thus, this study may serve as a starting point for future anatomical and physiological studies assessing the changes in the lower airways of these patients, including the comparison among active disease, controlled disease and healthy controls in a more robust sample.

Conclusions

In conclusion, the present study shows that acromegalic patients have abnormalities consistent with the involvement of the small airways and ventilation inhomogeneity, both in terms of lung function and structure. However, the air trapping detected by HRCT cannot be explained either by hormone levels or changes in lung function.

Declarations

Acknowledgements

The authors wish to thank the Rio de Janeiro State Research Supporting Foundation (FAPERJ).

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Postgraduate Programme in Medical Sciences, State University of Rio de Janeiro
(2)
Rehabilitation Sciences Master’s Program, Augusto Motta University Center
(3)
Department of Radiology, State University of Rio de Janeiro
(4)
Department of Endocrinology, Federal University of Rio de Janeiro, RuaRodolpho Paulo Rocco
(5)
Biomedical Instrumentation Laboratory, Institute of Biology and Faculty of Engineering, State University of Rio de Janeiro, Rua São Francisco Xavier

References

  1. Holdaway IM, Rajasoorya C: Epidemiology of acromegaly. Pituitary. 1999, 2: 29-41. 10.1023/A:1009965803750.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Casini AF, Araújo PB, Fontes R, Xavier SS, Gadelha MR: Cardiac morphology and performance alterations and analysis of determinant factors of left ventricular hypertrophy in 40 patients with acromegaly. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2006, 50: 82-90. 10.1590/S0004-27302006000100012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Orme SM, McNally RJ, Cartwright RA, Belchetz PE: Mortality and cancer incidence in acromegaly: a retrospective cohort study, United Kingdom acromegaly study group. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1998, 83: 2730-2734. 10.1210/jc.83.8.2730.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Dekkers OM, Biermasz NR, Pereira AM, Romijn JA, Vandenbroucke JP: Mortality in acromegaly: a metaanalysis. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2008, 93: 61-67.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Fedrizzi D, Rodrigues TC, Costenaro F, Scalco R, Czepielewski MA: Hypertension-related factors in patients with active and inactive acromegaly. Arq Bras Endocrinol Metabol. 2011, 55: 468-474. 10.1590/S0004-27302011000700006.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Bates AS, Van’t Hoff W, Jones JM, Clayton RN: An audit of outcome of treatment in acromegaly. Q J Med. 1993, 86: 293-299.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Melmed S: Acromegaly and cancer: not a problem. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2001, 86: 2929-2934. 10.1210/jc.86.7.2929.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Colao A, Ferone D, Marzullo P, Lombardi G: Systemic complications of acromegaly: epidemiology, pathogenesis, and management. Endocr Rev. 2004, 25: 102-152. 10.1210/er.2002-0022.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  9. Ben-Shlomo A, Melmed S: Acromegaly. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2008, 37: 101-122. 10.1016/j.ecl.2007.10.002.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Harrison BD, Millhouse KA, Harrington M, Nabarro JD: Lung function in acromegaly. Q J Med. 1978, 47: 517-532.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  11. Trotman-Dickenson B, Weetman AP, Hughes JM: Upper airflow obstruction and pulmonary function in acromegaly: relationship to disease activity. Q J Med. 1991, 79: 527-538.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  12. Chanson P, Salenave S: Acromegaly. Orphanet J Rare Dis. 2008, 3: 1-17. 10.1186/1750-1172-3-1.View ArticleGoogle Scholar
  13. García-Río F, Pino JM, Díez JJ, Ruíz A, Villasante C, Villamor J: Reduction of lung distensibility in acromegaly after suppression of growth hormone hypersecretion. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2001, 164: 852-857. 10.1164/ajrccm.164.5.2005059.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  14. Lieberman SA, Bjorkengren AG, Hoffman AR: Rheumatologic and skeletal changes in acromegaly. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 1992, 21: 615-631.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  15. Margolis RN, Canalis E, Pertridge NC: Anabolic hormones in bone: basic research and therapeutic potential. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 1996, 81: 872-877. 10.1210/jc.81.3.872.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  16. Scarpa R, De Brasi D, Pivonello R, Marzullo P, Manguso F, Sodano A, Oriente P, Lombardi G, Colao A: Acromegalicaxialarthropathy: a clinical case–control study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2004, 89: 598-603. 10.1210/jc.2003-031283.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  17. Stern EJ, Webb WR: Dynamic imaging of lung morphology with ultrafast high-resolution computed tomography. J Thorac Imaging. 1993, 8: 273-282. 10.1097/00005382-199323000-00003.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  18. Lee KW, Chung SY, Yang I, Lee Y, Ko EY, Park MJ: Correlation of aging and smoking with air trapping at thin-section CT of the lung in asymptomatic subjects. Radiology. 2000, 214: 831-836. 10.1148/radiology.214.3.r00mr05831.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  19. Giustina A, Barkan A, Casanueva FF, Cavagnini F, Frohman L, Ho K, Veldhuis J, Wass J, Von Werder K, Melmed S: Criteria for cure of acromegaly: a consensus statement. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2000, 85: 526-529. 10.1210/jc.85.2.526.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  20. Giustina A, Chanson P, Bronstein MD, Klibanski A, Lamberts S, Casanueva FF, Trainer P, Ghigo E, Ho K, Melmed S: Acromegaly consensus group: a consensus on criteria for cure of acromegaly. J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2010, 95: 3141-3148. 10.1210/jc.2009-2670.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  21. Miller MR, Hankinson J, Brusasco V, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, Crapo R, Enright P, Van der Grinten CP, Gustafsson P, Jensen R, Johnson DC, MacIntyre N, McKay R, Navajas D, Pedersen OF, Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Wanger J: ATS/ERS task force: ATS/ERS task force, standardization of spirometry. Eur Respir J. 2005, 26: 319-338. 10.1183/09031936.05.00034805.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  22. Neder JA, Andreoni S, Castelo-Filho A, Nery LE: Reference values for lung function tests. I. Static volumes. Braz J Med Biol Res. 1999, 32: 703-717.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  23. Neder JA, Andreoni S, Lerario MC, Nery LE: Reference values for lung function tests. II. Maximal respiratory pressures and voluntary ventilation. Braz J Med Biol Res. 1999, 32: 719-727.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  24. Neder JA, Andreoni S, Peres C, Nery LE: Reference values for lung function tests. III. Carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (transfer factor). Braz J Med Biol Res. 1999, 32: 729-737. 10.1590/S0100-879X1999000600008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  25. Pereira CAC, Sato T, Rodrigues SC: New reference values for forced spirometry in white adults in Brazil. J Bras Pneumol. 2007, 33: 397-406. 10.1590/S1806-37132007000400008.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  26. Pellegrino R, Viegi G, Brusasco V, Crapo RO, Burgos F, Casaburi R, Coates A, Van der Grinten CP, Gustafsson P, Hankinson J, Jensen R, Johnson DC, MacIntyre N, McKay R, Miller MR, Navajas D, Pedersen OF, Wanger J: Interpretative strategies for lung function tests. Eur Respir J. 2005, 26: 948-968. 10.1183/09031936.05.00035205.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  27. Bengtsson BA, Brummer RJ, Bosaeus I: Growth hormone and body composition. Horm Res. 1990, 33 (Suppl 4): 19-24.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  28. Brody JS, Fisher AB, Gocmen A, DuBois AB: Acromegalicpneumonomegaly: lung growth in the adult. J Clin Invest. 1970, 49: 1051-1060. 10.1172/JCI106321.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  29. Haber PS, Colebatch HJ, Ng CK, Greaves IA: Alveolar size as a determinant of pulmonary distensibility in mammalian lungs. J Appl Physiol. 1983, 54: 837-845.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  30. Donnelly PM, Grunstein RR, Peat JK, Woolcock AJ, Bye PT: Large lungs and growth hormone: an increased alveolar number?. Eur Respir J. 1995, 8: 938-947.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  31. Irvin CG: Guide to the evaluation of pulmonary function. Physiologic Basis of Respiratory Disease. Edited by: Martin HS. 2005, Hamilton: BC Decker Inc, 649-658.Google Scholar
  32. Keddissi JI, Elya MK, Farooq SU, Youness HA, Jones KR, Awab A, Kinasewitz GT: Bronchial responsiveness in patients with restrictive spirometry. Biomed Res Int. 2013, 2013: 498205-PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  33. Mead J: Dysanapsis in normal lungs assessed by the relationship between maximal flow, static recoil, and vital capacity. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1980, 121: 339-342.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  34. Siafakas NM, Sigalas J, Filaditaki B, Tsirogiannis K: Small airway function in acromegaly. Bull Eur Physiopathol Respir. 1987, 23: 329-334.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  35. Mastaglia FL, Barwich DD, Hall R: Myopathy in acromegaly. Lancet. 1970, 2: 907-909.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  36. Iandelli I, Gorini M, Duranti R, Bassi F, Misuri G, Pacini F, Rosi E, Scano G: Respiratory muscle function and control of breathing in patients with acromegaly. Eur Respir J. 1997, 10: 977-982. 10.1183/09031936.97.10050977.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  37. Evans CC, Hipkin LJ, Murray GM: Pulmonary function in acromegaly. Thorax. 1977, 32: 322-327. 10.1136/thx.32.3.322.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  38. Labbe A, Delcros B, Dechelotte P, Nouailles C, Grizard G: Comparative studies of the binding of prolactin and growth hormone by rabbit and human lung cell membrane fraction. Biol Neonate. 1992, 61: 179-187. 10.1159/000243741.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  39. Hansell DM, Wells AU, Rubens MB, Cole PJ: Bronchiectasis: functional significance of areas of decreased attenuation at expiratory CT. Radiology. 1994, 193: 369-374.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  40. Mastora I, Remy-Jardin M, Sobaszek A, Boulenguez C, Remy J, Edme JL: Thin-section CT finding in 250 volunteers: assessment of the relationship of CT findings with smoking history and pulmonary function test results. Radiology. 2001, 218: 695-702. 10.1148/radiology.218.3.r01mr08695.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  41. Tanaka N, Matsumoto T, Miura G, Emoto T, Matsunaga N, Ueda K, Lynch DA: Air trapping at CT: high prevalence in asymptomatic subjects with normal pulmonary function. Radiology. 2003, 227: 776-785. 10.1148/radiol.2273020352.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  42. Verbeken EK, Cauberghs M, Mertens I, Clement J, Lauweryns JM, Van De Woestijne KP: The senile lung: comparison with normal and emphysematous lungs. 1. Structural aspects. Chest. 1992, 101: 793-799. 10.1378/chest.101.3.793.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  43. Gillooly M, Lamb D: Airspace size in lungs of lifelong non-smokers: effect of age and sex. Thorax. 1993, 48: 39-43. 10.1136/thx.48.1.39.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  44. Janssens JP: Aging of the respiratory system: impact on pulmonary function tests and adaptation to exertion. Clin Chest Med. 2005, 26: 469-484. 10.1016/j.ccm.2005.05.004.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  45. Lalley PM: The aging respiratory system-pulmonary structure, function and neural control. Respir Physiol Neurobiol. 2013, 187: 199-210. 10.1016/j.resp.2013.03.012.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  46. Knudson RJ, Lebowitz MD, Holberg CJ, Burrows B: Changes in the normal maximal expiratory flow-volume curve with growth and aging. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1983, 127: 725-734.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  47. Copley SJ, Wells AU, Hawtin KE, Gibson DJ, Hodson JM, Jacques AE, Hansell DM: Lung morphology in the elderly: comparative CT study of subjects over 75 years old versus those under 55 years old. Radiology. 2009, 251: 566-673. 10.1148/radiol.2512081242.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  48. Jo SH, Choi YJ, Cho GY, Kim HS, Jung KS, Rhim CY: Tracheal calcification. CMAJ. 2008, 179: 291-10.1503/cmaj.070099.PubMed CentralView ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  49. Fryburg DA, Gelfand RA, Barrett EJ: Growth hormone acutely stimulates forearm muscle protein synthesis in normal humans. Am J Physiol. 1991, 260: E499-E504.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  50. D'Errico A, Scarani P, Colosimo E, Spina M, Grigioni WF, Mancini AM: Changes in the alveolar connective tissue of the ageing lung: an immunohistochemical study. Virchows Arch A Pathol Anat Histopathol. 1989, 415: 137-144. 10.1007/BF00784351.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar

Copyright

© Camilo et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. 2013

This article is published under license to BioMed Central Ltd. This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

Advertisement