Open Access

COPD heterogeneity: implications for management

Multidisciplinary Respiratory Medicine201611:14

https://doi.org/10.1186/s40248-016-0053-4

Received: 19 February 2016

Accepted: 20 February 2016

Published: 17 March 2016

Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a complex and heterogeneous disease and its definition as a disease characterised by a non completely reversible airflow obstruction mainly caused by cigarette smoke does not fully describe the variability in its clinical presentation.

The main complain of patients with COPD is exertional dyspnea caused by hyperinflation [1]. Therefore, the basis of treatment is the optimal bronchodilation, which is also effective in reducing the future risk of exacerbations [2]. However, despite optimal bronchodilation, some patients may experience episodes of exacerbation. In order to manage these more challenging patients we need to take into account the diversity of the disease. In recent years, there has been a growing interest in defining and characterising the different types of COPD patients, commonly known as “clinical phenotypes” [3]. These phenotypes include patients that share clinical features and similar response to available treatments, and may have prognostic implications [4].

Yet in 2012, the Spanish guidelines of COPD (GesEPOC) identified four different phenotypes with clinical relevance and therapeutic repercussion: the non exacerbator phenotype, the exacerbator phenotype with emphysema or with chronic bronchitis and the asthma-COPD overlap syndrome (ACOS) [5]. The exacerbator phenotype is defined as two or more exacerbations during the previous year [6]. The initial differentiation between exacerbators and non exacerbators is crucial to prevent the inadequate use of anti-inflammatory drugs in patients without exacerbations. Among the exacerbators, GesEPOC identifies three different phenotypes; frequent exacerbators with emphysema or with chronic bronchitis and ACOS, which can also present with frequent exacerbations [7].

Exacerbators with emphysema should receive long acting bronchodilators (LABD) combined with inhaled corticosteroids (ICS) when LABD are not enough to control symptoms and exacerbations, and in particular if they have high concentrations of eosinophils in peripheral blood [8]. They can also benefit from pulmonary rehabilitation and endoscopic volume reduction in carefully selected cases. For patients with frequent exacerbations and chronic bronchitis, there are other anti-inflammatories in addition to ICS that can provide benefits, such as roflumilast, mucolytics at high doses or long-term macrolides in very selected cases and under close supervision [5]. ACOS patients use to have increased airflow reversibility and eosinophil counts in sputum and peripheral blood [7]. Some studies demonstrated that patients with COPD and high eosinophil blood counts treated with ICS presented a significant reduction in exacerbations compared with patients treated with LABA alone [9]. Therefore, ACOS patients should be treated with a combination of LABA/ICS from early stages, irrespective of the number of exacerbations in order to improve symptoms and control eosinophilic inflammation. Frequently, ACOS patients use to be asthmatics who smoked and developed non-fully reversible airflow limitation. In fact, a previous diagnosis of asthma in a patient with COPD can strongly suggest the diagnosis of ACOS [10]. Furthermore, LABA/ICS will be the first line treatment in exacerbators that have evidence of increased eosinophilic inflammation. However, the debate about the magnitude of eosinophilic inflammation necessary to consider the use of ICS is still ongoing.

The phenotypic approach to treatment has been followed by other European guidelines such as the Czech Republic, the Finnish, the Russian or the Swedish ones [11]. Some of the previously described phenotypes, such as the exacerbator or the ACOS, are acknowledged by all, while the Czech guidelines also include the COPD-bronchiectasis and the pulmonary cachexia [12].

The identification of clinical phenotypes of COPD reflects the heterogeneity of the disease and helps clinicians to select the most suitable treatment for their patients. The phenotypes proposed in recent guidelines are easy to identify in routine clinical practice.

Declarations

Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

Authors’ Affiliations

(1)
Pneumology Department, Hospital Universitari Vall d’Hebron

References

  1. Rossi A, Aisanov Z, Avdeev S, Di Maria G, Donner CF, Izquierdo JL, et al. Mechanisms, assessment and therapeutic implications of lung hyperinflation in COPD. Respir Med. 2015;109:785–802.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  2. Cooper CB, Barjaktarevic I. A new algorithm for the diagnosis of COPD. Lancet Respir Med. 2015;3:266–8.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  3. Han MK, Agusti A, Calverley PM, Celli BR, Criner G, Curtis JL, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease phenotypes: the future of COPD. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010;182:598–604.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  4. Miravitlles M, Calle M, Soler-Cataluña JJ. Clinical phenotypes of COPD: identification, definition and implications for guidelines. Arch Bronconeumol. 2012;48:86–98.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  5. Miravitlles M, Soler-Cataluña JJ, Calle M, Molina J, Almagro P, Quintano JA, et al. Spanish guideline for COPD (GesEPOC) update 2014. Arch Bronconeumol. 2014;50 Suppl 1:1–16.PubMedGoogle Scholar
  6. Hurst JR, Vestbo J, Anzueto A, Locantore N, Müllerova H, Tal-Singer R, et al. Susceptibility to exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. N Engl J Med. 2010;363:1128–38.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  7. Barrecheguren M, Esquinas C, Miravitlles M. The asthma-chronic obstructive pulmonary disease overlap syndrome (ACOS): opportunities and challenges. Curr Opin Pulm Med. 2015;21(1):74–9.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  8. Pavord ID, Lettis S, Locantore N, Pascoe S, Jones PW, Wedzicha JA, et al. Blood eosinophils and inhaled corticosteroids/long acting β-2 agonist efficacy in COPD. Thorax. 2016;71:118–25.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  9. Pascoe S, Locantore N, Dransfield M, Barnes NC, Pavord ID. Blood eosinophil counts, exacerbations and response to the addition of inhaled fluticasone furoate to vilanterol in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease: a secondary analysis of data from two parallel randomized controlled trials. Lancet Respir Med. 2015;3:435–42.View ArticlePubMedGoogle Scholar
  10. Barrecheguren M, Román-Rodríguez M, Miravitlles M. Is a previous diagnosis of asthma a reliable criterion for asthma-COPD overlap síndrome in a patient with COPD? Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis. 2015;10:1745–52.PubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  11. Miravitlles M, Vogelmeier C, Roche N, Halpin D, Cardoso J, Chuchalin AG, et al. A review of national guidelines for management of COPD in Europe. Eur Respir J. 2016;47:625–37.View ArticlePubMedPubMed CentralGoogle Scholar
  12. Koblizek V, Chlumsky J, Zindr V, Neumannova K, Zatloukal J, Zak J, et al. Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: official diagnosis and treatment guidelines of the Czech Pneumological and Phthisiological Society: a novel phenotypic approach to COPD with patient oriented care. Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2013;157:189–201.Google Scholar

Copyright

© Barrecheguren and Miravitlles. 2016

Advertisement